eBotswana (Pty) Ltd v Sentech (Pty) Ltd and Others (11/16135) [2012] ZAGPJHC 231; 2013 (6) SA 327 (GSJ) (12 November 2012)
The court found that Sentech owed a legal duty of care to eBotswana, a licensed broadcaster in Botswana, to secure its satellite signal and prevent pirate viewing of SABC channels in Botswana. Sentech's failure to upgrade its encryption, despite acknowledging the risk and promising remedial action, was wrongful and negligent. The widespread availability of Philibao decoders and the resulting loss of viewership and advertising revenue to eBotswana were foreseeable consequences of Sentech's conduct. The purchase of decoders by Botswana viewers did not constitute a novus actus interveniens, as it was anticipated and did not break the chain of causation. The court admitted the applicant's...
- Citation
- [2012] ZAGPJHC 231
- Parties
- Applicant: eBotswana (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Sentech (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: South African Broadcasting Corporation Ltd; Respondent: Independent Communications Authority of South Africa
- Court
- South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 12 November 2012
- Case Number
- 11/16135
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Application / Final Relief on Motion
- Outcome
- Application granted: declaratory and mandatory orders issued against Sentech; damages to be determined in subsequent enquiry.
- Judges
- Spilg
- Legal Topics
- Pure Economic Loss, Duty of Care, Satellite Broadcasting, Encryption Failure, International Comity, Market Survey Evidence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
eBotswana (Pty) Ltd
Applicant
Sentech (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
South African Broadcasting Corporation Ltd
Respondent
Independent Communications Authority of South Africa
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Final Relief on Motion
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Sentech owed a legal duty of care to eBotswana to prevent pirate viewing of SABC channels in Botswana.
- 2 Whether Sentech's failure to secure its satellite signal was wrongful and negligent under South African law of delict.
- 3 Whether the purchase of Philibao decoders by Botswana viewers constitutes a novus actus interveniens breaking the chain of causation.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that Sentech owed a legal duty of care to eBotswana, a licensed broadcaster in Botswana, to secure its satellite signal and prevent pirate viewing of SABC channels in Botswana. Sentech's failure to upgrade its encryption, despite acknowledging the risk and promising remedial action, was wrongful and negligent. The widespread availability of Philibao decoders and the resulting loss of viewership and advertising revenue to eBotswana were foreseeable consequences of Sentech's conduct. The purchase of decoders by Botswana viewers did not constitute a novus actus interveniens, as it was anticipated and did not break the chain of causation. The court admitted the applicant's...
Court Disposition
Application granted: declaratory and mandatory orders issued against Sentech; damages to be determined in subsequent enquiry.
Orders
- It is declared that Sentech is liable in delict for failing to take all reasonable steps necessary to prevent pirate viewing in Botswana of the SABC 1, SABC 2 and SABC 3 signal carried on the Vivid platform.
- Sentech is directed to take all reasonable steps necessary to ensure that viewers in Botswana are prevented, within three months of the date of this order, from pirate viewing the SABC 1, SABC 2, and SABC 3 signal carried on the Vivid platform, subject to possible extension on good cause shown.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment