ECD v BDD (878/2019) [2020] ZAECPEHC 47 (26 November 2020)
The court found that the applicant does have financial means at her disposal to finance her legal costs and is not required to exhaust all her assets before seeking a contribution. However, the respondent has already made substantial contributions towards the applicant's legal costs, and the previous contribution was intended to cover costs up to the first day of trial, including expert reports. Since the last trial date was set, not much has transpired to justify the amount claimed by the applicant. The applicant has access to banking accounts held in her name, and her reluctance to attend mediation is concerning. The court determined that a further contribution of R300,000.00 would be...
- Citation
- [2020] ZAECPEHC 47
- Parties
- Applicant: E[…] C[….] D[…] (born D[…] S[…]); Respondent: B[…] D[…] D[…]
- Court
- Eastern Cape High Court, Port Elizabeth
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 26 November 2020
- Case Number
- 878/2019
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Application / Application for Contribution Towards Legal Costs in Pending Divorce Action
- Outcome
- Application partially granted. Respondent ordered to pay a further contribution of R300,000.00 towards applicant's costs in the divorce action. Costs of the application to be costs in the cause. Costs for the application for leave to file a supplementary affidavit to be borne by the applicant, including costs of two...
- Judges
- NG Beshe
- Legal Topics
- Contribution Towards Legal Costs, Rule 43 Application, Divorce Proceedings, Parity of Arms, Costs Orders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
E[…] C[….] D[…] (born D[…] S[…])
Applicant
B[…] D[…] D[…]
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Application for Contribution Towards Legal Costs in Pending Divorce Action
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to a further contribution towards her legal costs in the divorce action.
- 2 Whether the amount claimed by the applicant is reasonable and justified.
- 3 Whether the respondent possesses the financial means to pay the contribution sought.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant does have financial means at her disposal to finance her legal costs and is not required to exhaust all her assets before seeking a contribution. However, the respondent has already made substantial contributions towards the applicant's legal costs, and the previous contribution was intended to cover costs up to the first day of trial, including expert reports. Since the last trial date was set, not much has transpired to justify the amount claimed by the applicant. The applicant has access to banking accounts held in her name, and her reluctance to attend mediation is concerning. The court determined that a further contribution of R300,000.00 would be...
Court Disposition
Application partially granted. Respondent ordered to pay a further contribution of R300,000.00 towards applicant's costs in the divorce action. Costs of the application to be costs in the cause. Costs for the application for leave to file a supplementary affidavit to be borne by the applicant, including costs of two...
Orders
- Respondent is ordered to pay a further contribution of R300,000.00 towards applicant's costs in the divorce action, to be paid within sixty (60) days from the date of judgment.
- Costs of this application to be costs in the cause.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment