Edgars Consolidated Stores Limited and Central News Agency (Pty) Ltd / Consolidated News Agency (Pty) Ltd (81/LM/Nov02) [2002] ZACT 65 (18 November 2002)

Edgars Consolidated Stores Limited and Central News Agency (Pty) Ltd / Consolidated News Agency (Pty) Ltd (81/LM/Nov02) [2002] ZACT 65 (18 November 2002)

The Tribunal found that Edcon and CNA do not compete in the same relevant product markets for audio and audio-visual products, toys, or stationery. The only overlap exists in the cellular telecommunication market, where the merged entity's market share will be 8.6%. The market is highly competitive and...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2002] ZACT 65
Parties
Applicant: Edgars Consolidated Stores Limited; Respondent: Central News Agency (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Consolidated News Agency (Pty) Ltd
Court
Competition Tribunal
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Case Number
81/LM/Nov02
Procedural Posture
Large Merger / Merger Clearance Reasons
Outcome
Merger approved without conditions.
Judges
N. Manoim, F. Fourie, M. Holden
Legal Topics
Large Merger Review, Market Definition, Failing Firm, Public Interest, Market Share Analysis
Competition Law Commercial and Corporate Large Merger Review Market Definition Failing Firm Public Interest Market Share Analysis

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 10
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Edgars Consolidated Stores Limited

Applicant

Central News Agency (Pty) Ltd

Respondent

Consolidated News Agency (Pty) Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Large Merger / Merger Clearance Reasons

  1. 1 Does the merger between Edgars Consolidated Stores Limited and CNA substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market?
  2. 2 Is the cellular telecommunication market affected by the merger?
  3. 3 Are there any public interest grounds that would prevent approval of the merger?

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal found that Edcon and CNA do not compete in the same relevant product markets for audio and audio-visual products, toys, or stationery. The only overlap exists in the cellular telecommunication market, where the merged entity's market share will be 8.6%. The market is highly competitive and unconcentrated, with several large competitors and low barriers to entry. The Tribunal agreed with the Competition Commission's recommendation that the merger will not substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market. No public interest grounds were raised that would prevent approval. The merger was therefore approved without conditions.

Court Disposition

Merger approved without conditions.

Orders

  • The merger between Edgars Consolidated Stores Limited and CNA is approved without conditions.
  • A Merger Clearance Certificate is issued.