Elankor Ses (Pty) Ltd v Additional Magistrate Port Elizabeth and Others (1759/08) [2008] ZAECHC 163; 2009 (3) SA 22 (E) (19 September 2008)

Elankor Ses (Pty) Ltd v Additional Magistrate Port Elizabeth and Others (1759/08) [2008] ZAECHC 163; 2009 (3) SA 22 (E) (19 September 2008)

The High Court has jurisdiction to review Magistrates' Court proceedings under section 24 of the Supreme Court Act, even when the Magistrates' Court acts under ESTA. The Land Claims Court does not have exclusive review jurisdiction over inferior courts for procedural irregularities; its review powers under ESTA are limited to administrative acts and automatic review of eviction orders. However, the effect of the Land Claims Court's judgment on automatic review is ambiguous. It is unclear whether the original eviction order was set aside or merely remitted for further consideration. Due to this ambiguity, the court cannot determine whether the first respondent committed a gross...

Citation
[2008] ZAECHC 163
Parties
Applicant: Elankor Ses (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: The Additional Magistrate, Port Elizabeth; Respondent: Mzwandile Ngcosholo (and other occupiers of the farm Portion 89, Kragga Kamma)
Court
High Courts - Eastern Cape
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
19 September 2008
Case Number
1759/08
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Application for Review of Magistrate's Eviction Order
Outcome
Application postponed sine die; costs reserved.
Judges
Froneman, Pickering
Legal Topics
Extension of Security of Tenure Act, Automatic Review, Magistrates Court Jurisdiction, Functus Officio, Gross Irregularity
Land and Property Civil Procedure Extension of Security of Tenure Act Automatic Review Magistrates Court Jurisdiction Functus Officio Gross Irregularity

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Elankor Ses (Pty) Ltd

Applicant

The Additional Magistrate, Port Elizabeth

Respondent

Mzwandile Ngcosholo (and other occupiers of the farm Portion 89, Kragga Kamma)

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Review Application / Application for Review of Magistrate's Eviction Order

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Does the High Court have jurisdiction to review a Magistrate's Court eviction order under section 24 of the Supreme Court Act when the matter falls under ESTA?
  2. 2 Was the first respondent functus officio after the initial eviction order, and did he commit a gross irregularity by setting aside his own order?
  3. 3 Was the original eviction order validly set aside by the Land Claims Court on automatic review?

Ratio Decidendi

The High Court has jurisdiction to review Magistrates' Court proceedings under section 24 of the Supreme Court Act, even when the Magistrates' Court acts under ESTA. The Land Claims Court does not have exclusive review jurisdiction over inferior courts for procedural irregularities; its review powers under ESTA are limited to administrative acts and automatic review of eviction orders. However, the effect of the Land Claims Court's judgment on automatic review is ambiguous. It is unclear whether the original eviction order was set aside or merely remitted for further consideration. Due to this ambiguity, the court cannot determine whether the first respondent committed a gross...

Court Disposition

Application postponed sine die; costs reserved.

Orders

  • The application is postponed sine die.
  • The costs of the application are reserved.