Element Six Abrasives S.A and Barat Carbide Holding Gmbh (66/LM/Jun07) [2007] ZACT 74 (24 October 2007)
- Citation
- [2007] ZACT 74
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Court
- Competition Tribunal
- Panel
- D Lewis, N Manoim, Y Carrim
- Case number
- 66/LM/Jun07
More details
- Court
- Competition Tribunal
- Panel
- D Lewis, N Manoim, Y Carrim
- Case number
- 66/LM/Jun07
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The Tribunal found that the combined global market share of the merging parties in the broad market for hard material products is low, estimated at about 6%. In the narrowly defined markets, there is no overlap in activities. Vertical concerns such as input and customer foreclosure were dismissed due to the presence of alternative suppliers and customers in all relevant markets. The transaction does not raise public interest concerns. Therefore, the merger is unlikely to substantially lessen or prevent competition in any relevant market and is approved unconditionally.
Court disposition
Merger approved unconditionally.
Orders
- The merger between Element Six Abrasives S.A. and Barat Carbide Holding Gmbh is approved without conditions.
02
Material facts
Parties
Element Six Abrasives S.A.
Applicant Counsel: Webber Wentzel Bowens AttorneysBarat Carbide Holding Gmbh
RespondentAmounts and remedies
- Combined Global Market Share (hard Material Products): 6
- Barat Holdings Global Market Share (tungsten Carbide Wear Parts): 1
- Barat Holdings Market Share (mining and Tunnelling Tools, South Africa): 16
- Element Six Global Market Share (pcd Cutting Inserts): 49
03
Procedural history
Posture
Merger Control / Tribunal Approval and Reasons
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether the proposed merger between Element Six Abrasives S.A. and Barat Carbide Holding Gmbh is likely to substantially lessen or prevent competition in any relevant market.
- 02
Whether any public interest concerns arise from the transaction.
Party arguments
- Applicant
- Element Six argued that the transaction would allow it to expand beyond diamond-based products into the broader hard material market. The parties submitted that there is no overlap in their activities, supporting a narrow market definition between carbide products and superabrasive products. They contended that significant differences in product properties, uses, and prices justify separate markets, and that the merger would not raise competition concerns.
- Respondent
- Barat Carbide Holding Gmbh, through its controlling shareholder Equita, viewed the merger as an opportunity for Equita to realise its investment and exit the market. The respondent did not dispute the applicant's market definition and agreed that there was no overlap in activities. The Commission, however, defined the market more broadly and raised potential vertical concerns, but ultimately conceded that no competition issues would arise.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Competition Act, 89 of 1998
A merger may only be prohibited if it is likely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market.
- 02
Competition Tribunal Guidelines
Vertical and horizontal analyses must consider market shares, input and customer foreclosure, and the availability of alternative suppliers and customers.
- 03
Competition Act, 89 of 1998
Public interest considerations must be assessed, including the effect on employment and the ability of small businesses to compete.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The Tribunal found that the combined global market share of the merging parties in the broad market for hard material products is low, estimated at about 6%. In the narrowly defined markets, there is no overlap in activities. Vertical concerns such as input and customer foreclosure were dismissed due to the presence of alternative suppliers and customers in all relevant markets. The transaction does not raise public interest concerns. Therefore, the merger is unlikely to substantially lessen or prevent competition in any relevant market and is approved unconditionally.
Obiter and limits
- The Tribunal noted that the precise definition of the relevant product market was unnecessary, as the outcome would be the same whether the market was defined narrowly or broadly.
- The Tribunal observed that the international nature of the market and the absence of tariffs or import duties facilitate competition among global players.
Court disposition
Merger approved unconditionally.
- The merger between Element Six Abrasives S.A. and Barat Carbide Holding Gmbh is approved without conditions.
Source and reliance status
Competition Tribunal
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
Competition Tribunal
Judgment
COMPETITION TRIBUNAL OF SOUTH
AFRICA
Case No: 66/LM/Jun07
In the matter between:
Element Six Abrasives S.A. Acquiring Firm
And
Barat Carbide Holding Gmbh Target Firm
Panel : D Lewis (Presiding Member), N Manoim (Tribunal
Member) and Y Carrim (Tribunal Member)
Heard on : 26 September 2007
Order Issued : 26 September 2007
Reasons Issued: 24 October 2007
Reasons for Decision
APPROVAL
On 26 September 2007, the Tribunal unconditionally approved the merger between Element Six Abrasives S.A. and Barat Carbide Holding Gmbh. The reasons for approving the transaction follow.
THE PARTIES
The primary acquiring firm is Element Six Abrasives S.A. (âElement Sixâ), a company incorporated under the laws of Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg. Element Six has in excess of twenty subsidiaries worldwide. In South Africa Element Six controls Element Six (Production) (Pty) Ltd (âElement Six Productionâ), and Element Six (Pty) Ltd (âElement 6â).
Element Six is jointly controlled by Element Six SA (âElement Six SAâ) and Umicore Abrasives S.A. (âUmicoreâ). Element Six SA is controlled by De Beers Investments (Lux), a company incorporated under the laws of the Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg (âDe Beersâ). The issued shares in De Beers are held by the Anglo American Group (with a 45% shareholding), the Central Holdings Group (with a 40% shareholding), and the Government of Botswana (with a 15% shareholding).
Umicore is controlled by Umicore Finance Luxembourg S.A. (âUmicore Financeâ), which is in turn, controlled by a subsidiary of Umicore Belgium (âUmicore Belgiumâ), a company incorporated under the laws of Belgium.
The primary target firm is Barat Carbide Holding GmbH (âBarat Holdingsâ), a German limited liability company. Barat Holdings is controlled by Equita GmbH & Co Fonds 3 KaA (âEquitaâ). Barat Holdings controls three firms namely Barat Carbide GmbH, Barat Hard Alloy (Wuxi) Co Limited and Barat Carbide (Pty) Ltd (âBarat SAâ).1
DESCRIPTION
OF THE TRANSACTION
This is an international transaction in terms of which Element Six intends to acquire the entire issued share capital of Barat Holdings from Equita and minority shareholders.2
RATIONALE FOR THE
TRANSACTION
The primary acquiring firm perceives this transaction as an opportunity to expand beyond its diamond-based products range into the broader âhard materialâ market.
From the primary target firmâs perspective, the merger allows Equita, which is a private equity company, to realise its return on investment and exit from the market.
THE PARTIESâ
ACTIVITIES
Primary acquiring firm
Element Six is a global manufacturer and supplier of high quality superabrasives and industrial diamond materials including synthetic and natural diamond and the complementary superabrasives cubic carbon nitride. Diamond and cubic carbon nitride products are mainly used in the manufacture of tools for applications including drilling, sawing, cutting, grinding and polishing of different materials such as ferrous and non-ferrous metals, natural stone and concrete, wood based materials, plastics, glass and ceramics.
In South Africa, Element Six is involved in the manufacturing of superabrasives and industrial diamond materials including carbide tooling, ceramic components, metal components, carbide substrate, synthesis products and acid recovery of diamond products.
Primary target firm
Barat Holdings is a global manufacturer and distributor of carbide. It manufactures hard metal products ranging from powder processing to complete tools. The tools are used in instances where wear is problematic and common materials such as steel area of limited application.
Barat Holdings also produces soft rock tools, which are components of tooling systems for the extraction and removal of minerals, asphalt and concrete. These tools can also be used in the construction (foundation/pile drilling), mining and tunnelling industries, crushing and of wood, compost and soil preparation, as well as trenching and soil stabilisation.
Barat SA3 manufactures and supplies tungsten carbide powders, tools for the mining industry as well as wear parts for the steel processes and industrial wear parts applications. It supplies soft rock tools to the coal mining industry, wear parts are sold to various industries and tungsten carbide inserts are supplied to original equipment manufacturers (âOEMsâ). Carbide powders are not sold to third parties, but are largely consumed in-house.
THE
RELEVANT MARKET
Relevant product market
The merging firms are both active in the market for manufacturing of hard materials. The acquiring firm is involved in the manufacturing of superabrasive products and the target firm manufactures carbide products. The merging firms submitted that there is no overlap in their activities and that 4 the differences between the hard materials manufactured by them supported a narrow market definition. They defined two separate product markets namely the market for carbide products and the market for superabrasive products on the basis that there were
significant differences between the properties of the products and their use as well as significant difference in their prices.5 The Commission, on the other hand, defined the relevant product market as the broad market for hard material products. While the Commission agrees with the merging parties that there is no overlap in the activities of the parties in the narrow market, as defined by them, it still contends that the market should be defined as the market for hard material products since there is substitution between carbide products and superabasives in certain industries.6 In our view, it is not necessary to make a finding on the most appropriate definition of the relevant product market since the global market shares of the merged entity remain low irrespective of whether the market is defined narrowly or broadly.
The Commission identified three vertical markets that are affected by this transaction and these are:
[15.1] The market for the manufacturing of substrate tungsten carbide disks where Barat Holdings is active. Element Six purchases substrate tungsten carbide disks from Barat Holdings which serve as backing disks to its polycrystalline diamond products range;
[15.2] The market for the manufacturing of carbide powders where Barat Holdings is active. Element Six utilises carbide powders in its manufacturing process and Barat Holdings is involved in the manufacturing of carbide powders; and
[15.3] The market for mining and tunnelling tools where Barat Holdings is active. De Beers, the controlling firm of the primary acquiring firm and Anglo American Group are involved in mining and Barat manufacture mining and tunnelling tools and it is anticipated that Barat Holdings will be sourcing polycrystalline diamond (âPCDâ) inserts from Element Six
Relevant geographic market
The relevant geographic market for both the horizontal and vertical product markets is international. This is because the merging parties compete with global players and their customers are located throughout the world. In addition there are no tariffs or import duties on carbide products and superabrasives are low bulk high volume products which can be transported easily around the world via airfreight.7
COMPETITION
ANALYSIS
Horizontal analysis
The combined global market shares of the merging parties in the broader market for the manufacturing of hard material products is estimated to be about 6%. They face competition from global players such as Diamond Innovations, Megadiamond, ABC Superabrasives and Xertech. The Commission conceded that in the narrowly defined market there is no overlap in the activities of the merging parties and, as a result, there are no competition concerns.8
Vertical analysis
Substrate tungsten
The South African plant of Barat Holdings does not manufacture substrate tungsten carbide disks and the Barat group of companies does not sell substrate tungsten carbide disks to any other South African company. Element Six sources its substrate tungsten carbide disks from Barat Carbide Germany.
Barat Holdings has less than 1% global market share for the market for the manufacturing of tungsten carbide wear parts. All of Barat Holdingsâ tungsten carbide wear parts are used by Element Six. Barat Holdings supplies only 12.5% of Element Sixâs tungsten carbide wear parts requirements. From this, it is evident that no input foreclosure concerns arise as there are alternative global suppliers of carbide disks and these include Sandvik (with a 25% market share), Ceratizit (with a 20% market share), Kennametal (with a market share of 15%), and Zhou Zhou (with a 5% market share), among others. No customer foreclosure concerns arise as there are alternative customers of substrate tungsten carbide disks such as Boart Longyear, Sasol Synfuels and Corus.
Carbide Powders
With regards to carbide powders, the merging partiesâ state that approximately 82% of carbide powders manufactured by Barat Holdings are consumed internally and only 18% is sold to external parties. Of the sales to external parties, approximately 82% is sold to Element Six.
No input foreclosure concerns arise in this market as a result of this transaction since there are alternative global manufacturers of carbide powders such as Sandvick. Allegheny, Zhou Zhou, Kennametal, Starck, Metaltech and Tribaccher. Likewise, no customer foreclosure arises as there are alternative customers of carbide powders such as Atlas Copco, PMP and Boart Longyear. In addition, Element Sixâs total requirements for carbide powders constitute approximately 1% of the total supply of carbide powders. As a result, more than 90% of carbide powders are available in the market for other customers.
PCD cutting inserts
Barat Holdings does not source any of its PCD cutting inserts from Element Six. Barat Holdingsâ requirements of PCD cutting inserts constitutes less than 1% of the total PCD cutting inserts available in the market. Element Six has a global market share of 49% in the market for the manufacturing of PCD cutting inserts. Element Six is not in a position to refuse to supply PCD cutting inserts to other customers as Barat Holdings can only consume 1% of its output. There are many customers in the market and these include LTL Abrasives, W Diamant, Durasynthetic, Ehlers Tooling, Atlas, Copco, JDA Diamond, Huddy, Boart Longyear.
In addition there are alternative suppliers of PCD such as Diamond Innovation (with 22% market share), Lljin (with 9% market share) Sumitomo (with 5% market share) and Megadiamond (with 4% market share). The proposed transaction does not raise customer or input foreclosure concerns in the market for PCD cutting inserts.
Mining and Tunneling tools
Barat Holdings has a market share of approximately 16% in the national market for the manufacturing of mining and tunnelling tools. Barat Holdingsâ global market share is estimated to be less than 1%. No input foreclosure concerns arise from this transaction as there are alternative suppliers of mining and tunnelling tools such as Kennametal SA with 40% market share, Seco Rock with 19% market share, and Sandvik with 9% market share. No customer foreclosure concerns arise as there are alternative customers for mining and tunnelling tools such as Sasol Mines, EXXARO, and BHP Billiton.9
PUBLIC
INTEREST
There are no public interest issues.
CONCLUSION
The transaction is unlikely to result in the substantial lessening of competition in the relevant markets. There are no public interest issues. Accordingly, the transaction is approved unconditionally.
____ 24 October 2007
Y Carrim DATE
Tribunal Member
D Lewis and N Manoim concur in the judgment of Y Carrim
Tribunal Researcher : R Kariga
For the merging parties: Webber Wentzel Bowens Attorneys
For the Commission : E Ramohlola (Mergers and
Acquisitions)
1 The impact of the proposed transaction in South Africa arises in relation to the acquisition of control by Element Six over Barat Holdingsâ local subsidiary, Barat Carbide (Pty) Ltd
2 73.35% of the issued shares in Barat Holdings will to be acquired from Equita and the remaining 26.65% of the issued shares in Barat Holdings will be acquired from minority shareholders.
3 Barat SA is located in Springs, Johannesburg. See record page 96.
4 See record page 97.
5 See record page 97-101.
6 See Commissionâs Recommendations pages 6-7.
7 The competitors of the merging firms also confirmed that they are global players and that the supplies of hard material products compete worldwide.
8 See Commissionâs Recommendations page 9.
9 Anglo Coal currently purchases approximately 20% of its total mining and tunnelling tool requirements and 6% of Barat Holdingsâ total production of mining and tunnelling tools in South Africa.
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.