Engen Petroleum Ltd v Goudis Carriers (Pty) Ltd ( In Liquidation) (2013/ A5043) [2014] ZAGPJHC 273; [2015] 1 All SA 324 (GJ); 2015 (6) SA 21 (GJ) (20 October 2014)
Section 341(2) of the Companies Act 61 of 1973 does not empower the court to validate dispositions made by a company after the date of the final winding-up order. The phrase 'being wound up' refers to the period between the presentment of the winding-up application and the granting of the final order. After the final order, the company's office bearers lose authority to make valid dispositions, and only the liquidator may act for the company. The retrospective effect of concursus creditorum renders transactions made after the final order void, and the court's power to validate is limited to transactions made before the final order. The applicant must repay amounts received after the final...
- Citation
- [2014] ZAGPJHC 273
- Parties
- Applicant: Engen Petroleum Ltd; Respondent: Goudis Carriers (Pty) Ltd (In Liquidation)
- Court
- South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 20 October 2014
- Case Number
- 2013/ A5043
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Application / Judgment on Application and Counterclaim
- Outcome
- Application dismissed; counterclaim upheld. Applicant ordered to repay amounts received after the final winding-up order, with interest and costs.
- Judges
- R Sutherland
- Legal Topics
- Winding Up, Concursus Creditorum, Court Validation of Dispositions, Companies Act Section 341 2
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Engen Petroleum Ltd
Applicant
Goudis Carriers (Pty) Ltd (In Liquidation)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Judgment on Application and Counterclaim
Legal Issues
- 1 Does section 341(2) of the Companies Act 61 of 1973 empower a court to validate dispositions made by a company after the date of the final winding-up order?
- 2 Is the applicant liable to repay amounts received from the respondent after the final winding-up order was granted?
Ratio Decidendi
Section 341(2) of the Companies Act 61 of 1973 does not empower the court to validate dispositions made by a company after the date of the final winding-up order. The phrase 'being wound up' refers to the period between the presentment of the winding-up application and the granting of the final order. After the final order, the company's office bearers lose authority to make valid dispositions, and only the liquidator may act for the company. The retrospective effect of concursus creditorum renders transactions made after the final order void, and the court's power to validate is limited to transactions made before the final order. The applicant must repay amounts received after the final...
Court Disposition
Application dismissed; counterclaim upheld. Applicant ordered to repay amounts received after the final winding-up order, with interest and costs.
Orders
- The applicant is ordered to pay to the respondent the following amounts together with interest at 15.5% per annum from the dates listed until date of payment: R702,310.52 from 31 October 2012; R300,000 from 16 November 2013; R772,501.85 from 22 November 2012; R200,000 from 14 December 2012; R200,000 from 7 January...
- The applicant shall pay the respondent's costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment