Enviroserv Waste Management v Interwaste (Pty) t/a Interwaste Environmental Solutions and Others (P408/15) [2015] ZALCPE 66; (2016) 37 ILJ 959 (LC) (18 December 2015)
The court found that the applicant's activities at the second respondent's sites were performed solely in terms of a time-limited service agreement and did not constitute a business capable of transfer as a going concern under section 197 of the LRA. The first respondent's contract would commence with different operational methods, staff, and strategies, and no assets, goodwill, or intellectual property would be transferred. The applicant's employees were on fixed-term contracts tied to the duration of the service agreement, and their expectation of transfer was unreasonable. The court concluded that the termination of the service agreement and the award of a new contract to the first...
- Citation
- [2015] ZALCPE 66
- Parties
- Applicant: Enviroserv Waste Management; Respondent: Interwaste (Pty) Ltd t/a Interwaste Environmental Solutions; Respondent: General Motors South Africa (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: V.O’ Connel and 21 Others
- Court
- Labour Court Port Elizabeth
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 18 December 2015
- Case Number
- P408/15
- Procedural Posture
- Urgent Application / Application for Declaratory Relief Under Section 197 of the LRA
- Outcome
- Application dismissed with costs awarded against the applicant.
- Judges
- Lallie
- Legal Topics
- Section 197 Transfer, Fixed Term Contracts, Outsourcing, Business as Going Concern, Employee Expectation, Costs Order
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Enviroserv Waste Management
Applicant
Interwaste (Pty) Ltd t/a Interwaste Environmental Solutions
Respondent
General Motors South Africa (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
V.O’ Connel and 21 Others
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Application for Declaratory Relief Under Section 197 of the LRA
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the termination of a service agreement and subsequent award of a new contract to another service provider constitutes a transfer of business as a going concern under section 197 of the LRA.
- 2 Whether the applicant's employees are entitled to automatic transfer to the new service provider under section 197.
- 3 Whether the nature of the applicant's operations at the second respondent's site constitutes a business capable of transfer under section 197.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant's activities at the second respondent's sites were performed solely in terms of a time-limited service agreement and did not constitute a business capable of transfer as a going concern under section 197 of the LRA. The first respondent's contract would commence with different operational methods, staff, and strategies, and no assets, goodwill, or intellectual property would be transferred. The applicant's employees were on fixed-term contracts tied to the duration of the service agreement, and their expectation of transfer was unreasonable. The court concluded that the termination of the service agreement and the award of a new contract to the first...
Court Disposition
Application dismissed with costs awarded against the applicant.
Orders
- The application is dismissed.
- The applicant is ordered to pay the first respondent's costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment