E.S v MEC for Department of Health, Eastern Cape Province (529/2022) [2025] ZAECBHC 11 (15 May 2025)
The court found that the applicant only acquired the necessary knowledge of the facts giving rise to her claim and the identity of the debtor on 15 August 2021, when she received legal advice. The statutory notice was served within six months of this date, satisfying the requirements of section 3(2) of the Institution of Legal Proceedings Against Certain Organs of State Act, 2002. The respondent failed to provide evidence that the applicant could have acquired such knowledge earlier. The applicant is therefore entitled to a declarator confirming compliance with the Act. The court also permitted the filing of the applicant's supplementary affidavit and found that the respondent's...
- Citation
- [2025] ZAECBHC 11
- Parties
- Applicant: E[...] S[...]; Respondent: MEC for Department of Health, Eastern Cape Province
- Court
- Eastern Cape High Court, Bhisho
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 15 May 2025
- Case Number
- 529/2022
- Procedural Posture
- Interlocutory Application / Application for Declaratory Relief And/or Condonation Prior to Trial
- Outcome
- Declarator granted in favour of the applicant; condonation for supplementary affidavit granted; costs awarded against the respondent.
- Judges
- Hartle
- Legal Topics
- Institution of Legal Proceedings Against Organs of State Act, Prescription, Medical Negligence, Condonation, Statutory Notice Requirements
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
E[...] S[...]
Applicant
MEC for Department of Health, Eastern Cape Province
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application / Application for Declaratory Relief And/or Condonation Prior to Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant complied with section 3(2) of the Institution of Legal Proceedings Against Certain Organs of State Act, 2002.
- 2 Whether the applicant is entitled to condonation for late delivery of statutory notice.
- 3 Whether the applicant's claim has prescribed under the Prescription Act.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant only acquired the necessary knowledge of the facts giving rise to her claim and the identity of the debtor on 15 August 2021, when she received legal advice. The statutory notice was served within six months of this date, satisfying the requirements of section 3(2) of the Institution of Legal Proceedings Against Certain Organs of State Act, 2002. The respondent failed to provide evidence that the applicant could have acquired such knowledge earlier. The applicant is therefore entitled to a declarator confirming compliance with the Act. The court also permitted the filing of the applicant's supplementary affidavit and found that the respondent's...
Court Disposition
Declarator granted in favour of the applicant; condonation for supplementary affidavit granted; costs awarded against the respondent.
Orders
- The applicant's request to permit the filing of her supplementary affidavit is granted.
- It is declared that the applicant has complied with section 3(2) of the Institution of Legal Proceedings Against Certain Organs of State Act, 2002 in respect of her statutory notice dated 17 November 2021.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment