Essack and Another v Sun International South Africa (Pty) Ltd and Others (2020/23294) [2022] ZAGPJHC 353; 2022 (6) SA 221 (GJ) (24 May 2022)
The court held that the duties imposed by the North West Gambling Regulations, specifically regulations 22 and 23, are owed to society through the State and do not confer a civil remedy on excluded persons who breach their own exclusion. The regulatory framework is designed to protect the community, not to insure individual gamblers against their losses. The first plaintiff, having voluntarily excluded himself and then chosen to gamble, is the author of his own misfortune. The pleadings do not establish knowledge on the part of the first defendant of the first plaintiff's identity as an excluded person, which is required for liability under regulation 23. The claim based on Aquilian...
- Citation
- [2022] ZAGPJHC 353
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Suhail Essack; Plaintiff: Naseera Cassim; Defendant: Sun International South Africa (Pty) Ltd; Defendant: North West Gambling Board; Defendant: National Gambling Board
- Court
- South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 24 May 2022
- Case Number
- 2020/23294
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Procedure / Exception to Amended Particulars of Claim
- Outcome
- Exception upheld; particulars of claim do not disclose a cause of action against the first defendant. Costs awarded to the first defendant. Plaintiffs granted leave to amend within 20 days, failing which the claim is dismissed with costs.
- Judges
- Bester
- Legal Topics
- Exception Procedure, Statutory Duty, Aquilian Liability, Excluded Persons, Casino Regulation, Pure Economic Loss
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Suhail Essack
Plaintiff
Naseera Cassim
Plaintiff
Sun International South Africa (Pty) Ltd
Defendant
North West Gambling Board
Defendant
National Gambling Board
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Procedure / Exception to Amended Particulars of Claim
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the particulars of claim disclose a cause of action based on breach of statutory duty under the North West Gambling Regulations.
- 2 Whether the particulars of claim disclose a cause of action under Aquilian liability for pure economic loss.
- 3 Whether the pleadings are vague and embarrassing for failure to specify operative statutory provisions.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the duties imposed by the North West Gambling Regulations, specifically regulations 22 and 23, are owed to society through the State and do not confer a civil remedy on excluded persons who breach their own exclusion. The regulatory framework is designed to protect the community, not to insure individual gamblers against their losses. The first plaintiff, having voluntarily excluded himself and then chosen to gamble, is the author of his own misfortune. The pleadings do not establish knowledge on the part of the first defendant of the first plaintiff's identity as an excluded person, which is required for liability under regulation 23. The claim based on Aquilian...
Court Disposition
Exception upheld; particulars of claim do not disclose a cause of action against the first defendant. Costs awarded to the first defendant. Plaintiffs granted leave to amend within 20 days, failing which the claim is dismissed with costs.
Orders
- The first defendant's exception to the plaintiffs' amended particulars of claim is upheld with costs, including costs of additional submissions.
- The plaintiffs are liable for the first defendant's wasted costs in respect of its first exception dated 14 December 2020 and the preparation of heads of argument filed on 10 February 2021.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment