Essack and Another v Sun International South Africa (Pty) Ltd and Others (2020/23294) [2023] ZAGPJHC 1358 (15 November 2023)
The application for leave to appeal is dismissed because the particulars of claim do not plead the necessary knowledge or negligence required for a statutory or Aquilian claim. The first plaintiff has not pleaded any reliance on section 16 of the National Gambling Act, nor shown how it provides a remedy. The argument for development of the common law is not supported by pleaded facts. There is no compelling reason for leave to appeal, as the alleged novel issues have not been formulated or pleaded. The appeal would not have reasonable prospects of success.
- Citation
- [2023] ZAGPJHC 1358
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Suhail Essack; Plaintiff: Naseera Cassim; Defendant: Sun International South Africa (Pty) Ltd; Defendant: North West Gambling Board; Defendant: National Gambling Board
- Court
- South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 15 November 2023
- Case Number
- 2020/23294
- Procedural Posture
- Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Following an Upheld Exception
- Outcome
- Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs.
- Judges
- Bester
- Legal Topics
- Exception to Particulars of Claim, Statutory Duties of Casino Licensees, Aquilian Liability, Development of Common Law, Excluded Persons in Gambling, Leave to Appeal Requirements
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Suhail Essack
Plaintiff
Naseera Cassim
Plaintiff
Sun International South Africa (Pty) Ltd
Defendant
North West Gambling Board
Defendant
National Gambling Board
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Following an Upheld Exception
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the particulars of claim disclose a cause of action based on breach or negligent breach of statutory duties under North West Gambling Regulation 23.
- 2 Whether the first plaintiff pleaded the requisite knowledge or negligence on the part of the first defendant.
- 3 Whether a claim based on Aquilian liability is properly pleaded and whether the common law should be developed in this context.
Ratio Decidendi
The application for leave to appeal is dismissed because the particulars of claim do not plead the necessary knowledge or negligence required for a statutory or Aquilian claim. The first plaintiff has not pleaded any reliance on section 16 of the National Gambling Act, nor shown how it provides a remedy. The argument for development of the common law is not supported by pleaded facts. There is no compelling reason for leave to appeal, as the alleged novel issues have not been formulated or pleaded. The appeal would not have reasonable prospects of success.
Court Disposition
Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs.
Orders
- The application for leave to appeal is dismissed.
- The first plaintiff is ordered to pay the costs of the application.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment