Essential Sterolin Products (Pty) Ltd. v Commissioner for Inland Revenue (605/90) [1993] ZASCA 160; 1993 (4) SA 859 (AD); [1993] 2 All SA 632 (A) (30 September 1993)
The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the inability consideration was not received from a source within South Africa. The originating cause of the receipt was the reorganization of a business conducted predominantly in Europe, the grant of rights to a German distributor, and the protection and exploitation of patents and trademarks in West Germany. The only South African connection was the initial manufacture of the active substance, which was insufficient to establish a South African source. The inability consideration was linked to the potential deprivation of exclusive manufacturing rights as part of a European business transaction, and not to any activity or asset located in South...
- Citation
- [1993] ZASCA 160
- Parties
- Appellant: Essential Sterolin Products (Pty) Limited; Respondent: Commissioner for Inland Revenue
- Court
- Supreme Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 30 September 1993
- Case Number
- 605/90
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From the Transvaal Income Tax Special Court
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed with costs, including costs of two counsel. The revised assessment for the tax year ended 28 February 1983 is set aside and the matter is referred back to the Commissioner for reassessment.
- Judges
- Corbett, Van Heerden, Smalberger, Goldstone, Howie
- Legal Topics
- Source of Income, Gross Income Definition, International Taxation, Capital Vs Revenue, Patent Rights, Business Restructuring
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Essential Sterolin Products (Pty) Limited
Appellant
Commissioner for Inland Revenue
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From the Transvaal Income Tax Special Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the DM 4 000 000 'inability consideration' was received from a source within South Africa.
- 2 Whether the inability consideration constituted a capital or revenue receipt in the appellant's hands.
- 3 Whether the inability consideration fell within paragraph (g)(iii) of the definition of 'gross income' in section 1 of the Income Tax Act as a premium or like consideration for the use or right to use a process.
Ratio Decidendi
The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the inability consideration was not received from a source within South Africa. The originating cause of the receipt was the reorganization of a business conducted predominantly in Europe, the grant of rights to a German distributor, and the protection and exploitation of patents and trademarks in West Germany. The only South African connection was the initial manufacture of the active substance, which was insufficient to establish a South African source. The inability consideration was linked to the potential deprivation of exclusive manufacturing rights as part of a European business transaction, and not to any activity or asset located in South...
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed with costs, including costs of two counsel. The revised assessment for the tax year ended 28 February 1983 is set aside and the matter is referred back to the Commissioner for reassessment.
Orders
- The appeal is allowed.
- Appellant's revised assessment for the tax year ended 28 February 1983 is set aside.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment