E.W v V.H (12272/2022) [2023] ZAWCHC 58; [2023] 2 All SA 404 (WCC); 2023 (4) SA 123 (WCC) (17 March 2023)
The majority held that the applicant failed to establish the necessity or appropriateness of developing the common law to recognise a duty of support between unmarried opposite-sex permanent life partners following termination of the relationship. The court found that the applicant already has a common law remedy, as recent jurisprudence (Bwanya) recognises that a duty of support may arise in relationships akin to marriage, provided it is proven in a familial setting. The pending action is the appropriate forum to determine the existence of such a partnership and any entitlement to maintenance. The court emphasised that development of the common law requires clear parameters, sufficient...
- Citation
- [2023] ZAWCHC 58
- Parties
- Applicant: EW; Respondent: VH; Amicus Curiae: Women’s Legal Centre Trust
- Court
- Western Cape High Court, Cape Town
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 17 March 2023
- Case Number
- 12272/2022
- Procedural Posture
- Urgent Application / Full Court Hearing of Urgent Application for Interim Maintenance and Development of Common Law, Pending Final Determination of Action
- Outcome
- Application dismissed with no order as to costs.
- Judges
- Cloete, Wille, Slingers
- Legal Topics
- Maintenance Claims, Permanent Life Partnerships, Reciprocal Duty of Support, Bill of Rights Limitation, Development of Common Law
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
EW
Applicant
VH
Respondent
Women’s Legal Centre Trust
Amicus Curiae
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Full Court Hearing of Urgent Application for Interim Maintenance and Development of Common Law, Pending Final Determination of Action
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the common law should be developed to recognise a duty of support and maintenance between unmarried opposite-sex permanent life partners following termination of the relationship.
- 2 Whether the applicant is entitled to interim maintenance and a contribution towards costs pending the final determination of the action.
- 3 Whether the facts establish a permanent life partnership with reciprocal duties of support in a familial setting.
Ratio Decidendi
The majority held that the applicant failed to establish the necessity or appropriateness of developing the common law to recognise a duty of support between unmarried opposite-sex permanent life partners following termination of the relationship. The court found that the applicant already has a common law remedy, as recent jurisprudence (Bwanya) recognises that a duty of support may arise in relationships akin to marriage, provided it is proven in a familial setting. The pending action is the appropriate forum to determine the existence of such a partnership and any entitlement to maintenance. The court emphasised that development of the common law requires clear parameters, sufficient...
Court Disposition
Application dismissed with no order as to costs.
Orders
- The application is dismissed with no order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment