Exdev (Pty) Ltd and Another v Pekudei Investments (Pty) Ltd (97/10) [2010] ZASCA 170; 2011 (2) SA 282 (SCA) ; [2011] 2 All SA 371 (SCA) (1 December 2010)

Exdev (Pty) Ltd and Another v Pekudei Investments (Pty) Ltd (97/10) [2010] ZASCA 170; 2011 (2) SA 282 (SCA) ; [2011] 2 All SA 371 (SCA) (1 December 2010)

The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the sale and option agreements in clause 3 of the contract were separate, divisible, and independent. The sale of the office unit was valid and enforceable, as the essential characteristics—size and number of parking bays—were specified, and the seller's discretion over shape and location did not render the description too vague. The court applied established principles that a property need not be described with meticulous accuracy, and that subsequent selection or determination by one party is permissible if the essential features are agreed. The exception to the plea that the sale was unenforceable was correctly upheld, and the appeal was dismissed....

Citation
[2010] ZASCA 170
Parties
Appellant: Exdev (Pty) Ltd; Appellant: Rodney Wolmer; Respondent: Pekudei Investments (Pty) Ltd
Court
Supreme Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
1 December 2010
Case Number
97/10
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
Outcome
Appeal dismissed with costs; exception to the plea upheld.
Judges
Heher, Cachalia, Leach, R Pillay, Ebrahim
Legal Topics
Alienation of Land Act, Sale of Immovable Property, Contract Divisibility, Exception Procedure, Description of Property, Option Contracts
Land and Property Civil Procedure Commercial and Corporate Alienation of Land Act Sale of Immovable Property Contract Divisibility Exception Procedure Description of Property +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 11 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Exdev (Pty) Ltd

Appellant

Rodney Wolmer

Appellant

Pekudei Investments (Pty) Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the sale agreement for the office unit complied with section 2(1) of the Alienation of Land Act 68 of 1981.
  2. 2 Whether the description of the property sold was sufficiently certain to be enforceable.
  3. 3 Whether the sale and option in clause 3 constituted a single indivisible contract or separate divisible contracts.

Ratio Decidendi

The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the sale and option agreements in clause 3 of the contract were separate, divisible, and independent. The sale of the office unit was valid and enforceable, as the essential characteristics—size and number of parking bays—were specified, and the seller's discretion over shape and location did not render the description too vague. The court applied established principles that a property need not be described with meticulous accuracy, and that subsequent selection or determination by one party is permissible if the essential features are agreed. The exception to the plea that the sale was unenforceable was correctly upheld, and the appeal was dismissed....

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed with costs; exception to the plea upheld.

Orders

  • The appeal is dismissed with costs.
  • The order of the court a quo is altered to read: (a) The exception is upheld, with costs. (b) The words 'and 3.3 to 3.3.4 below' in para 3.2 of the plea are struck out. (c) Paragraph 3.3 of the plea is struck out.