Exxaro Resources Ltd v Cennergi (Pty) Ltd (LM125Oct19) [2019] ZACT 87 (4 December 2019)
- Citation
- [2019] ZACT 87
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Court
- Competition Tribunal
- Panel
- Yasmin Carrim, Fiona Tregenna, Thando Vilakazi
- Case number
- LM125Oct19
More details
- Court
- Competition Tribunal
- Panel
- Yasmin Carrim, Fiona Tregenna, Thando Vilakazi
- Case number
- LM125Oct19
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The Tribunal found that the proposed transaction does not give rise to any horizontal or vertical overlap in the relevant markets, as Exxaro does not have interests in other companies operating in the renewable energy sector. The Commission's investigation confirmed the absence of competition concerns. Furthermore, the merging parties and employee representatives confirmed that the transaction would not result in retrenchments or other public interest issues. Accordingly, the Tribunal concluded that the transaction is unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition and raises no public interest concerns. The merger was approved unconditionally.
Court disposition
The proposed merger is approved unconditionally.
Orders
- The proposed transaction between Exxaro Resources Ltd and Cennergi (Pty) Ltd is approved without conditions.
02
Material facts
Parties
Exxaro Resources Ltd
Applicant Counsel: Maphanga MasekoCennergi (Pty) Ltd
Respondent03
Procedural history
Posture
Merger Approval / Final Decision
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether the proposed acquisition of Cennergi by Exxaro raises competition concerns in any relevant market.
- 02
Whether the transaction gives rise to any public interest concerns, including potential retrenchments.
Party arguments
- Applicant
- Exxaro argued that the acquisition would result in full ownership and control of Cennergi, but there are no overlaps in activities between the parties, and no adverse effects on competition or employment are anticipated.
- Respondent
- Cennergi, through its employee representative, confirmed that the transaction would not result in retrenchments and that employees had no concerns. The Commission submitted that there is no horizontal or vertical overlap and no competition concerns.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Competition Act, No. 89 of 1998
A merger may only be prohibited if it is likely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market.
- 02
Competition Act, No. 89 of 1998
Public interest considerations, including the effect on employment, must be assessed in merger proceedings.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The Tribunal found that the proposed transaction does not give rise to any horizontal or vertical overlap in the relevant markets, as Exxaro does not have interests in other companies operating in the renewable energy sector. The Commission's investigation confirmed the absence of competition concerns. Furthermore, the merging parties and employee representatives confirmed that the transaction would not result in retrenchments or other public interest issues. Accordingly, the Tribunal concluded that the transaction is unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition and raises no public interest concerns. The merger was approved unconditionally.
Obiter and limits
- The Tribunal noted the strategic rationale for Khopoli's divestment, aligning with Tata Power's global strategy to deleverage by divesting sub-optimal sized international assets.
- The Tribunal acknowledged the importance of the Renewable Energy Independent Power Producer Procurement Program in facilitating new entrants and investments in the energy sector.
Court disposition
The proposed merger is approved unconditionally.
- The proposed transaction between Exxaro Resources Ltd and Cennergi (Pty) Ltd is approved without conditions.
Source and reliance status
Competition Tribunal
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
Competition Tribunal
Judgment
Competition tribunal
SOUTH
AFRICA
COMPETITION
TRIBUNAL OF SOUTH AFRICA
In the matter between:
Case No: LM125Oct19
Exxaro Resources Ltd
Primary Acquiring Firm
and
Cennergi (Pty) Ltd
Primary Target Firm
Panel : Yasmin Carrim (Presiding Member)
: Fiona Tregenna Tribunal Member)
: Thando Vilakazi (Tribunal Member)
Heard on: 4 December 2019
Order Issued on: 4 December 2019
Reasons Issued on: 4 December 2019
Reasons for Decision
Approval
[1] On 4 December 2019, the Competition Tribunal ("Tribunal") unconditionally approved the proposed transaction between Exxaro Resources Ltd and Cennergi (Pty) Ltd.
[2] The reasons for the unconditional approval follow.
Parties to proposed transaction
Primary acquiring firm
[3] The primary acquiring firm is Exxaro Resources Ltd ("Exxaro"), a public company listed on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange.
[4] Exxaro owns and controls various firms in the coal, base metals, titanium dioxide, ferrous and energy industries. However, of
relevance to the proposed transaction is Exxaro's 50% controlling interest in Cennergi (Pty) Ltd ("Cennergi"), the target
firm in the proposed transaction.
Primary target firm
[5] The primary target firm is Cennergi, a private company incorporated in accordance with the laws of South Africa. Cennergi is jointly controlled by Exxaro and Khopoli Investments Ltd ("Khopoli"), each with a 50% shareholding.
[6] Khopoli is a wholly owned subsidiary of Tata Power Company Ltd ("Tata Power"), a public company incorporated in accordance with the laws of India.
[7] Cennergi controls Tsitsikamma Community Wind Farm (RF) (Pty) Ltd, with a 75% shareholding, and Amakhala Emoyeni RE Project 1 (RF) (Pty) Ltd, with a 95% shareholding.
[8] Cennergi was formed in 2012, as a joint venture between Exxaro and Khopoli to take hold of the opportunities brought about by the Government of South Africa's Renewable Energy Independent Power Producer Procurement Program ("REIPPPP"). Cennergi is responsible for the production of electricity using wind turbines. The energy produced by Cennergi is supplied to Eskom in accordance
with a 20-year power purchasing agreement ("PPA").
Proposed transaction and rationale
[9] Exxaro will acquire the remaining 50% interest in Cennergi from Khopoli, such that, post-transaction, Exxaro will wholly own and control Cennergi.
[10] […]
[11] From the perspective of Khopoli, the decision to monetise this South African asset is in alignment with Tata Power's strategy to deleverage the Balance Sheet by divesting sub-optimal sized international assets.
Impact on competition
[12] The Commission considered the activities of the merging parties and found that there is no horizontal or vertical overlap arising from the proposed transaction. Furthermore, the Commission found that Exxaro does not have shares in any company, other than Cennergi, that operates in the renewable energy sector.
Public interest
[13] The merging parties confirmed that, given that there are no overlaps between their activities, the proposed transaction is unlikely to result in any retrenchments. This was confirmed by Takalani Maswime, the employee representative at Cennergi, who further submitted that the employees at Cennergi had no concerns regarding the proposed transaction.
Conclusion
[14] In light of the above, we concluded that the proposed transaction is unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market. In addition, the proposed transaction raises no public interest concerns. Accordingly, we approved the proposed transaction unconditionally.
____
Presiding Member: Ms Yasmin Carrim
Prof. Fiona Tregenna and Dr Thando Vilakazi concurring
4 December 2019
DATE
Case Manager: Helena Graham
For the merging parties: Maphanga Maseko of TGR Attorneys
For the Commission: Hlumani Mandia and Mogau Aphane
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.