Download PDF

South Africa Judgment

Competition Tribunal

Exxaro Resources Ltd v Cennergi (Pty) Ltd (LM125Oct19) [2019] ZACT 87 (4 December 2019)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The Tribunal found that the proposed transaction does not give rise to any horizontal or vertical overlap in the relevant markets, as Exxaro does not have interests in other companies operating in the renewable energy sector. The Commission's investigation confirmed the absence of competition concerns. Furthermore, the merging parties and employee representatives confirmed that the transaction would not result in retrenchments or other public interest issues. Accordingly, the Tribunal concluded that the transaction is unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition and raises no public interest concerns. The merger was approved unconditionally.

Court disposition

The proposed merger is approved unconditionally.

Orders

  • The proposed transaction between Exxaro Resources Ltd and Cennergi (Pty) Ltd is approved without conditions.

02

Material facts

Parties

Exxaro Resources Ltd

Applicant Counsel: Maphanga Maseko

Cennergi (Pty) Ltd

Respondent

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Merger Approval / Final Decision

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
Exxaro argued that the acquisition would result in full ownership and control of Cennergi, but there are no overlaps in activities between the parties, and no adverse effects on competition or employment are anticipated.
Respondent
Cennergi, through its employee representative, confirmed that the transaction would not result in retrenchments and that employees had no concerns. The Commission submitted that there is no horizontal or vertical overlap and no competition concerns.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Competition Act, No. 89 of 1998

    A merger may only be prohibited if it is likely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market.

  2. 02

    Competition Act, No. 89 of 1998

    Public interest considerations, including the effect on employment, must be assessed in merger proceedings.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The Tribunal found that the proposed transaction does not give rise to any horizontal or vertical overlap in the relevant markets, as Exxaro does not have interests in other companies operating in the renewable energy sector. The Commission's investigation confirmed the absence of competition concerns. Furthermore, the merging parties and employee representatives confirmed that the transaction would not result in retrenchments or other public interest issues. Accordingly, the Tribunal concluded that the transaction is unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition and raises no public interest concerns. The merger was approved unconditionally.

Obiter and limits

  • The Tribunal noted the strategic rationale for Khopoli's divestment, aligning with Tata Power's global strategy to deleverage by divesting sub-optimal sized international assets.
  • The Tribunal acknowledged the importance of the Renewable Energy Independent Power Producer Procurement Program in facilitating new entrants and investments in the energy sector.

Court disposition

The proposed merger is approved unconditionally.

  • The proposed transaction between Exxaro Resources Ltd and Cennergi (Pty) Ltd is approved without conditions.

Source and reliance status

Competition Tribunal

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Competition Tribunal

Judgment

[2019] ZACT 87

Competition tribunal

SOUTH

AFRICA

COMPETITION

TRIBUNAL OF SOUTH AFRICA

In the matter between:

Case No: LM125Oct19

Exxaro Resources Ltd

Primary Acquiring Firm

and

Cennergi (Pty) Ltd

Primary Target Firm

Panel : Yasmin Carrim (Presiding Member)

: Fiona Tregenna Tribunal Member)

: Thando Vilakazi (Tribunal Member)

Heard on: 4 December 2019

Order Issued on: 4 December 2019

Reasons Issued on: 4 December 2019

Reasons for Decision

Approval

[1] On 4 December 2019, the Competition Tribunal ("Tribunal") unconditionally approved the proposed transaction between Exxaro Resources Ltd and Cennergi (Pty) Ltd.

[2] The reasons for the unconditional approval follow.

Parties to proposed transaction

Primary acquiring firm

[3] The primary acquiring firm is Exxaro Resources Ltd ("Exxaro"), a public company listed on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange.

[4] Exxaro owns and controls various firms in the coal, base metals, titanium dioxide, ferrous and energy industries. However, of

relevance to the proposed transaction is Exxaro's 50% controlling interest in Cennergi (Pty) Ltd ("Cennergi"), the target

firm in the proposed transaction.

Primary target firm

[5] The primary target firm is Cennergi, a private company incorporated in accordance with the laws of South Africa. Cennergi is jointly controlled by Exxaro and Khopoli Investments Ltd ("Khopoli"), each with a 50% shareholding.

[6] Khopoli is a wholly owned subsidiary of Tata Power Company Ltd ("Tata Power"), a public company incorporated in accordance with the laws of India.

[7] Cennergi controls Tsitsikamma Community Wind Farm (RF) (Pty) Ltd, with a 75% shareholding, and Amakhala Emoyeni RE Project 1 (RF) (Pty) Ltd, with a 95% shareholding.

[8] Cennergi was formed in 2012, as a joint venture between Exxaro and Khopoli to take hold of the opportunities brought about by the Government of South Africa's Renewable Energy Independent Power Producer Procurement Program ("REIPPPP"). Cennergi is responsible for the production of electricity using wind turbines. The energy produced by Cennergi is supplied to Eskom in accordance

with a 20-year power purchasing agreement ("PPA").

Proposed transaction and rationale

[9] Exxaro will acquire the remaining 50% interest in Cennergi from Khopoli, such that, post-transaction, Exxaro will wholly own and control Cennergi.

[10] […]

[11] From the perspective of Khopoli, the decision to monetise this South African asset is in alignment with Tata Power's strategy to deleverage the Balance Sheet by divesting sub-optimal sized international assets.

Impact on competition

[12] The Commission considered the activities of the merging parties and found that there is no horizontal or vertical overlap arising from the proposed transaction. Furthermore, the Commission found that Exxaro does not have shares in any company, other than Cennergi, that operates in the renewable energy sector.

Public interest

[13] The merging parties confirmed that, given that there are no overlaps between their activities, the proposed transaction is unlikely to result in any retrenchments. This was confirmed by Takalani Maswime, the employee representative at Cennergi, who further submitted that the employees at Cennergi had no concerns regarding the proposed transaction.

Conclusion

[14] In light of the above, we concluded that the proposed transaction is unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market. In addition, the proposed transaction raises no public interest concerns. Accordingly, we approved the proposed transaction unconditionally.

____

Presiding Member: Ms Yasmin Carrim

Prof. Fiona Tregenna and Dr Thando Vilakazi concurring

4 December 2019

DATE

Case Manager: Helena Graham

For the merging parties: Maphanga Maseko of TGR Attorneys

For the Commission: Hlumani Mandia and Mogau Aphane

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Competition Act, No. 89 of 1998

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.