F & J Electrical CC v MEWUSA obo E Mashatola and Other (CCT 131/14) [2015] ZACC 3; 2015 (4) BCLR 377 (CC); (2015) 36 ILJ 1189 (CC); [2015] 5 BLLR 453 (CC) (17 February 2015)
The Constitutional Court held that the Labour Court erred in granting default judgment and refusing rescission. The Labour Court failed to establish jurisdiction, as the referral was out of time and no condonation was sought. The court relied on affidavits not served on the applicant and inconsistent with the statement of claim, resulting in procedural unfairness. The Labour Court also failed to consider the applicant's prospects of success in the rescission application. The default judgment was therefore erroneously granted and had to be rescinded. The applicant was granted leave to deliver its response to the statement of claim within ten court days. No order as to costs was made,...
- Citation
- [2015] ZACC 3
- Parties
- Applicant: F & J Electrical CC; Respondent: MEWUSA obo E Mashatola and Others
- Court
- Constitutional Court
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 17 February 2015
- Case Number
- CCT 131/14
- Procedural Posture
- Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal and Appeal From Labour Court Default Judgment and Rescission Refusal
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; default judgment rescinded; applicant granted leave to respond; no order as to costs.
- Judges
- Mogoeng, Moseneke, Cameron, Froneman, Khampepe, Leeuw, Madlanga, Nkabinde, Tshiqi, Van der Westhuizen, Zondo
- Legal Topics
- Automatically Unfair Dismissal, Trade Union Membership, Rescission of Default Judgment, Jurisdiction of Labour Court, Condonation, Compensation for Unfair Dismissal
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
F & J Electrical CC
Applicant
MEWUSA obo E Mashatola and Others
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal and Appeal From Labour Court Default Judgment and Rescission Refusal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Labour Court had jurisdiction to adjudicate the dispute without a condonation application for late referral.
- 2 Whether the default judgment was erroneously granted in the absence of the applicant.
- 3 Whether affidavits not served on the applicant could be relied upon to grant default judgment.
Ratio Decidendi
The Constitutional Court held that the Labour Court erred in granting default judgment and refusing rescission. The Labour Court failed to establish jurisdiction, as the referral was out of time and no condonation was sought. The court relied on affidavits not served on the applicant and inconsistent with the statement of claim, resulting in procedural unfairness. The Labour Court also failed to consider the applicant's prospects of success in the rescission application. The default judgment was therefore erroneously granted and had to be rescinded. The applicant was granted leave to deliver its response to the statement of claim within ten court days. No order as to costs was made,...
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; default judgment rescinded; applicant granted leave to respond; no order as to costs.
Orders
- Leave to appeal is granted.
- The appeal is upheld.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment