F v F and Others (6172/2011) [2011] ZAGPJHC 184 (6 December 2011)
The applicant failed to provide the necessary financial information, specifically his and the first respondent's annual gross income, which is essential to determine eligibility for exemption or reduction of school fees under the South African Schools Act and its regulations. Without this information, the court could not assess whether the applicant qualified for any relief. The applicant bore the onus of proof and did not discharge it. Consequently, the application was dismissed with costs.
- Citation
- [2011] ZAGPJHC 184
- Parties
- Applicant: B C F; Respondent: M F; Respondent: Pretoria Boys High School; Respondent: Rivonia Primary School
- Court
- South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 6 December 2011
- Case Number
- 6172/2011
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Application / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Application dismissed with costs.
- Judges
- L M Hodes
- Legal Topics
- School Fee Exemption, Maintenance Order, Divorce Settlement, Onus of Proof
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
B C F
Applicant
M F
Respondent
Pretoria Boys High School
Respondent
Rivonia Primary School
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to exemption from payment of school fees for the minor children under the South African Schools Act and its regulations.
- 2 Whether the first respondent is obliged to complete exemption application forms for school fees.
- 3 Whether the applicant has discharged the onus of proving eligibility for exemption or reduction of school fees.
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant failed to provide the necessary financial information, specifically his and the first respondent's annual gross income, which is essential to determine eligibility for exemption or reduction of school fees under the South African Schools Act and its regulations. Without this information, the court could not assess whether the applicant qualified for any relief. The applicant bore the onus of proof and did not discharge it. Consequently, the application was dismissed with costs.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed with costs.
Orders
- The application is dismissed with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment