Fani and Others v National Department of Public Works (EL738/2020) [2020] ZAECELLC 19 (29 October 2020)
The court found that the applicants were unlawfully evicted from their homes by the demolition operation carried out by the second respondent on the instructions of the first respondent. The evidence, including affidavits and photographic material, established that the demolished structures were occupied homes, and the respondents failed to provide a credible or detailed account to rebut this. The prior court order relied upon by the respondents did not authorise the eviction or demolition of occupied homes without due process under the PIE Act and section 26(3) of the Constitution. The demolition occurred without a court order specifically authorising eviction, and during the national...
- Citation
- [2020] ZAECELLC 19
- Parties
- Applicant: Simphiwe Fani and 77 Others; Applicant: Vathiswa Jack; Respondent: National Department of Public Works; Respondent: Sheriff of the Court
- Court
- Eastern Cape High Court, East London Local Court
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 29 October 2020
- Case Number
- EL738/2020
- Procedural Posture
- Urgent Application / Final Determination After Joinder and Hearing
- Outcome
- Application granted in favour of the applicants; eviction declared unlawful; restoration and return of goods ordered; compensation issue postponed.
- Judges
- Hartle
- Legal Topics
- Unlawful Eviction, Prevention of Illegal Eviction Act, Section 26 Constitution, Joinder of Parties, Restoration of Possession, Compensation for Eviction
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Simphiwe Fani and 77 Others
Applicant
Vathiswa Jack
Applicant
National Department of Public Works
Respondent
Sheriff of the Court
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Final Determination After Joinder and Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants were unlawfully evicted from their homes by the demolition operation on 27 July 2020.
- 2 Whether the demolition of the applicants' homes was authorised by a valid court order or constituted arbitrary eviction.
- 3 Whether the applicants are entitled to restoration, reparation, and/or compensation as a result of the eviction.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicants were unlawfully evicted from their homes by the demolition operation carried out by the second respondent on the instructions of the first respondent. The evidence, including affidavits and photographic material, established that the demolished structures were occupied homes, and the respondents failed to provide a credible or detailed account to rebut this. The prior court order relied upon by the respondents did not authorise the eviction or demolition of occupied homes without due process under the PIE Act and section 26(3) of the Constitution. The demolition occurred without a court order specifically authorising eviction, and during the national...
Court Disposition
Application granted in favour of the applicants; eviction declared unlawful; restoration and return of goods ordered; compensation issue postponed.
Orders
- The eviction of each applicant by the demolition of their homes on 27 July 2020 is declared unlawful.
- Applicants are entitled to reconstituted restoration of their homes on a temporary basis pending finalisation of eviction proceedings.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment