Fargo and Others v Vecto Trade (Edms) Bpk (LCC96/06) [2007] ZALCC 5 (7 March 2007)
The court found that the magistrate erred in granting the eviction order without properly determining whether the right of residence had been lawfully terminated in accordance with the Extension of Security of Tenure Act. The evidence showed that a labour dispute regarding the termination of employment was referred to the CCMA and only resolved by settlement in July 2005. In terms of section 8(3) of the Act, the right of residence could only be terminated once the dispute was resolved. The section 9(2)(d) notices were served before the resolution of the dispute, rendering them premature and invalid. The magistrate also failed to identify the relevant statutory basis for eviction and did...
- Citation
- [2007] ZALCC 5
- Parties
- Appellant: Saul Fargo (Snr); Appellant: Sera Fargo; Appellant: Saul Fargo (Jnr); Appellant: Japie Ferreira; Respondent: Vecto Trade (Edms) Bpk.
- Court
- Land Claims Court
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 7 March 2007
- Case Number
- LCC96/06
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Magistrate's Eviction Order
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; eviction order set aside; application for remittal dismissed; no order as to costs.
- Judges
- Bam, Pienaar
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Security of Tenure Act, Eviction Procedure, Termination of Right of Residence, Labour Dispute Referral, Section 9 Notices, Waiver of Rights
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Saul Fargo (Snr)
Appellant
Sera Fargo
Appellant
Saul Fargo (Jnr)
Appellant
Japie Ferreira
Appellant
Vecto Trade (Edms) Bpk.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Magistrate's Eviction Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the termination of the appellants' right of residence was lawful under the Extension of Security of Tenure Act.
- 2 Whether the eviction order was granted in compliance with section 9(2) and section 10 of the Act.
- 3 Whether the pending labour dispute before the CCMA suspended the termination of the right of residence.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the magistrate erred in granting the eviction order without properly determining whether the right of residence had been lawfully terminated in accordance with the Extension of Security of Tenure Act. The evidence showed that a labour dispute regarding the termination of employment was referred to the CCMA and only resolved by settlement in July 2005. In terms of section 8(3) of the Act, the right of residence could only be terminated once the dispute was resolved. The section 9(2)(d) notices were served before the resolution of the dispute, rendering them premature and invalid. The magistrate also failed to identify the relevant statutory basis for eviction and did...
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; eviction order set aside; application for remittal dismissed; no order as to costs.
Orders
- The appeal succeeds.
- The order of the court a quo is set aside in its entirety.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment