Farocean Marine (Pty) Ltd v Minister of Trade and Industry (614/05) [2006] ZASCA 137; 2007 (2) SA 334 (SCA) (30 November 2006)
The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the Minister of Trade and Industry, as the embodiment of the Department, is entitled to institute proceedings for recovery of benefits paid under the GEIS, acting on behalf of the State. The powers conferred on the Director-General by the Guidelines are exercised on behalf of the Department, and the Minister may put the Department's case before the court. The court further found that the debt for recovery of unduly paid GEIS benefits only became due after the Director-General conducted an investigation, was satisfied that the claim was based on false or misleading information, and decided to disallow the claim and recover the benefits paid. The...
- Citation
- [2006] ZASCA 137
- Parties
- Appellant: Farocean Marine (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Minister of Trade and Industry of the Republic of South Africa
- Court
- Supreme Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 30 November 2006
- Case Number
- 614/05
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Dismissal of Special Pleas
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs.
- Judges
- Farlam, Mlambo, Maya, Combrinck, Malan
- Legal Topics
- Prescription Act, Locus Standi, General Export Incentive Scheme, Administrative Action, Recovery of State Benefits
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Farocean Marine (Pty) Ltd
Appellant
Minister of Trade and Industry of the Republic of South Africa
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Dismissal of Special Pleas
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Minister of Trade and Industry has locus standi to institute proceedings for recovery of benefits paid under the General Export Incentive Scheme (GEIS).
- 2 Whether the respondent's claim for recovery of benefits paid to the appellant has prescribed under the Prescription Act 68 of 1969.
- 3 When does the debt for recovery of unduly paid GEIS benefits become due for purposes of prescription.
Ratio Decidendi
The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the Minister of Trade and Industry, as the embodiment of the Department, is entitled to institute proceedings for recovery of benefits paid under the GEIS, acting on behalf of the State. The powers conferred on the Director-General by the Guidelines are exercised on behalf of the Department, and the Minister may put the Department's case before the court. The court further found that the debt for recovery of unduly paid GEIS benefits only became due after the Director-General conducted an investigation, was satisfied that the claim was based on false or misleading information, and decided to disallow the claim and recover the benefits paid. The...
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment