Farquhar v Scheffer and Another (A319/2006) [2008] ZAGPHC 66 (5 February 2008)
The court held that the guarantees provided by the purchaser were delivered to the transfer attorney within the stipulated period and that such delivery constituted compliance with the deed of sale. The contract was not severable regarding erf 90 due to the globular purchase price, but the inability to transfer erf 90 did not render the contract void. The appellant was not entitled to cancel the contract without giving proper notice to remedy any alleged defects in the guarantees, as the respondent had not repudiated the agreement. The respondent ultimately tendered payment of the full purchase price, resolving any outstanding issues. The court ordered that fresh guarantees for...
- Citation
- [2008] ZAGPHC 66
- Parties
- Appellant: Shane Peter Farquhar; Respondent: Carel Prinsloo Scheffer; Respondent: The Registrar of Deeds
- Court
- High Courts - Gauteng
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 5 February 2008
- Case Number
- A319/2006
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Order Compelling Transfer of Property Pursuant to Deed of Sale
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; order of court a quo set aside and substituted; appellant to pay costs.
- Judges
- C Botha, C P Rabie, T J Vilakazi
- Legal Topics
- Specific Performance, Contractual Repudiation, Guarantees in Property Sale, Severability of Contract, Breach of Contract
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Shane Peter Farquhar
Appellant
Carel Prinsloo Scheffer
Respondent
The Registrar of Deeds
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Order Compelling Transfer of Property Pursuant to Deed of Sale
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the guarantees provided by the purchaser complied with the requirements of the deed of sale.
- 2 Whether the inability to transfer erf 90 rendered the contract void or severable.
- 3 Whether the appellant validly cancelled the contract due to alleged breach or repudiation.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the guarantees provided by the purchaser were delivered to the transfer attorney within the stipulated period and that such delivery constituted compliance with the deed of sale. The contract was not severable regarding erf 90 due to the globular purchase price, but the inability to transfer erf 90 did not render the contract void. The appellant was not entitled to cancel the contract without giving proper notice to remedy any alleged defects in the guarantees, as the respondent had not repudiated the agreement. The respondent ultimately tendered payment of the full purchase price, resolving any outstanding issues. The court ordered that fresh guarantees for...
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; order of court a quo set aside and substituted; appellant to pay costs.
Orders
- The order of the court a quo is set aside and substituted.
- The first respondent shall on or before 20 February 2008 deliver to the applicant a fresh guarantee for the payment of R650,000.00 against the transfer of erven 85, 86, 87, 88 and 89 in Kaapsche Hoop.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment