Fawd Investments (Pty) Ltd v Cruz and Others (2022/21239) [2024] ZAGPJHC 1081 (22 October 2024)

Fawd Investments (Pty) Ltd v Cruz and Others (2022/21239) [2024] ZAGPJHC 1081 (22 October 2024)

The court found that the applicants failed to demonstrate any reasonable prospect that another court would reach a different conclusion regarding the eviction order. The factual and legal findings in the main judgment were sound and no compelling reason was advanced for leave to appeal. Accordingly, the application...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] ZAGPJHC 1081
Parties
Applicant: Fawd Investments (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Jose Da Cruz; Respondent: The Unlawful Occupiers of Unit [...] M[...] B[...] H[...]; Respondent: Rui Miguel De Figueiredo N.O., the Trustee for the Time Being of the LWWS Holding Trust with registration number IT3059/04 (T); Respondent: Tanya Rocha N.O., the Trustee for the Time Being of the LWWS Holding Trust with registration number IT3059/04(T); Respondent: Maria Da Conceicao De Freita Vasconcelos N.O., the Trustee for the Time Being of the LWWS Holding Trust with registration number IT3059/04(T); Respondent: Redlex 297 (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Revenue Asset Protection Services; Respondent: Mario Alexandre De Figuriedo Rocha; Respondent: The Minister of Police; Respondent: Ekhuruleni Metropolitan Municipality
Court
South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Case Number
2022/21239
Procedural Posture
Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Following Eviction Judgment
Outcome
Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs.
Judges
GC Wright
Legal Topics
Leave to Appeal, Eviction Proceedings, Prospects of Success, Costs Award
Civil Procedure Land and Property Leave to Appeal Eviction Proceedings Prospects of Success Costs Award

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Fawd Investments (Pty) Ltd

Applicant

Jose Da Cruz

Respondent

The Unlawful Occupiers of Unit [...] M[...] B[...] H[...]

Respondent

Rui Miguel De Figueiredo N.O., the Trustee for the Time Being of the LWWS Holding Trust with registration number IT3059/04 (T)

Respondent

Tanya Rocha N.O., the Trustee for the Time Being of the LWWS Holding Trust with registration number IT3059/04(T)

Respondent

Maria Da Conceicao De Freita Vasconcelos N.O., the Trustee for the Time Being of the LWWS Holding Trust with registration number IT3059/04(T)

Respondent

Redlex 297 (Pty) Ltd

Respondent

Revenue Asset Protection Services

Respondent

Mario Alexandre De Figuriedo Rocha

Respondent

The Minister of Police

Respondent

Ekhuruleni Metropolitan Municipality

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Following Eviction Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the applicants have reasonable prospects of success on appeal.
  2. 2 Whether there are compelling reasons to grant leave to appeal against the eviction order.
  3. 3 Whether costs should be awarded against the applicants.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicants failed to demonstrate any reasonable prospect that another court would reach a different conclusion regarding the eviction order. The factual and legal findings in the main judgment were sound and no compelling reason was advanced for leave to appeal. Accordingly, the application for leave to appeal was dismissed. The applicants were ordered to pay the costs of the respondent, Fawd Investments (Pty) Ltd, jointly and severally.

Court Disposition

Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • The application for leave to appeal is dismissed.
  • Applicants 1-4, 7 and 8 are jointly and severally ordered to pay the costs of the respondent, Fawd Investments (Pty) Ltd.