FAWU obo Members v Imperial Logistics (Pty) Ltd and Others (Application for Leave to Appeal) (JR62/20) [2024] ZALCJHB 465 (22 November 2024)
The court found that the applicant failed to meet the threshold for leave to appeal as set out in section 17(1) of the Superior Courts Act. The grounds raised by the applicant largely repeated arguments already considered and addressed in the original judgment. The applicant did not demonstrate reasonable prospects...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2024] ZALCJHB 465
- Parties
- Applicant: FAWU obo Members; Respondent: Imperial Logistics (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Eleanor Hambidge N. O; Respondent: The Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration
- Court
- Labour Court Johannesburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 22 November 2024
- Case Number
- JR62/20
- Procedural Posture
- Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Following Judgment on Review
- Outcome
- Application for leave to appeal dismissed.
- Judges
- G Mafa-Chali
- Legal Topics
- Collective Agreements, Severance Pay, Contractual Incorporation, Interpretation of Agreements, Leave to Appeal, Reasonable Prospects of Success
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
FAWU obo Members
Applicant
Imperial Logistics (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Eleanor Hambidge N. O
Respondent
The Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Following Judgment on Review
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant has demonstrated reasonable prospects of success for leave to appeal against the judgment.
- 2 Whether the interpretation of the collective agreements entitled FAWU members to severance pay of two weeks per completed year of service.
- 3 Whether the terms of the collective agreement remained incorporated into individual contracts after expiry.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant failed to meet the threshold for leave to appeal as set out in section 17(1) of the Superior Courts Act. The grounds raised by the applicant largely repeated arguments already considered and addressed in the original judgment. The applicant did not demonstrate reasonable prospects that the Labour Appeal Court would reach a different conclusion regarding the interpretation of the collective agreements or the entitlement to severance pay. The court was satisfied that the issues had been adequately canvassed and that no compelling reason existed to grant leave to appeal. Accordingly, the application for leave to appeal was dismissed.
Court Disposition
Application for leave to appeal dismissed.
Orders
- The application for leave to appeal is dismissed.
- There is no order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment