Ferro South Africa (Pty) Ltd v Performance Colour Systems, a Division of Speed Bird Investment Holdings (Pty) Ltd (LM120Oct19) [2020] ZACT 82 (29 January 2020)
The Tribunal found that the proposed merger between Ferro and PCS would not substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market. The product overlap was limited due to differences in product mix and customer base. The merged entity's market share would be constrained by imports and other competitors. Concerns regarding bundling and tying were unsubstantiated, as similar bundles could be offered by other market participants. No vertical foreclosure concerns were identified, and all PCS employees would be transferred in accordance with section 197 of the Labour Relations Act. No public interest issues arose from the transaction. Accordingly, the Tribunal approved the merger...
- Citation
- [2020] ZACT 82
- Parties
- Applicant: Ferro South Africa (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Performance Colour Systems, a Division of Speed Bird Investment Holdings (Pty) Ltd
- Court
- Competition Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 29 January 2020
- Case Number
- LM120Oct19
- Procedural Posture
- Merger Control / Approval
- Outcome
- The proposed merger is approved unconditionally.
- Judges
- Y Carrim, A Ndoni, H Cheadle
- Legal Topics
- Merger Control, Market Share Analysis, Vertical Overlap, Bundling and Tying, Public Interest, Labour Relations Act Transfer
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ferro South Africa (Pty) Ltd
Applicant
Performance Colour Systems, a Division of Speed Bird Investment Holdings (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Merger Control / Approval
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the proposed merger between Ferro and PCS is likely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market.
- 2 Whether the merger raises any public interest concerns, including employment effects.
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that the proposed merger between Ferro and PCS would not substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market. The product overlap was limited due to differences in product mix and customer base. The merged entity's market share would be constrained by imports and other competitors. Concerns regarding bundling and tying were unsubstantiated, as similar bundles could be offered by other market participants. No vertical foreclosure concerns were identified, and all PCS employees would be transferred in accordance with section 197 of the Labour Relations Act. No public interest issues arose from the transaction. Accordingly, the Tribunal approved the merger...
Court Disposition
The proposed merger is approved unconditionally.
Orders
- The proposed transaction is approved unconditionally.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment