Ferroland Ground Trust (Pty) Ltd v Commission For Conciliation Mediation And Arbitration (JR194/20) [2024] ZALCJHB 273 (25 July 2024)

Ferroland Ground Trust (Pty) Ltd v Commission For Conciliation Mediation And Arbitration (JR194/20) [2024] ZALCJHB 273 (25 July 2024)

The Labour Court found that the Commissioner’s conclusion that the dismissal was procedurally unfair due to failure to inform and consult the trade union was unreasonable, as the Code of Good Practice serves as a guideline and does not confer legal rights. The Court held that non-compliance with the Code is not fatal unless it results in an unfair dismissal, and in this case, Mr Lehong was represented by his union during the appeal and arbitration, mitigating any procedural defect. On substantive fairness, the Court found that the Commissioner failed to properly balance the seriousness of the misconduct, namely dishonesty, against mitigating factors. The employer’s disciplinary code...

Citation
[2024] ZALCJHB 273
Parties
Applicant: Ferroland Ground Trust (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Commission For Conciliation Mediation And Arbitration; Respondent: Matloga N, N.O.; Respondent: Food and Allied Workers Union; Respondent: Lehong A
Court
Labour Court Johannesburg
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
25 July 2024
Case Number
JR1942/20
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Judgment on Review of Arbitration Award
Outcome
The arbitration award is reviewed and set aside. The dismissal of the Fourth Respondent was procedurally and substantively fair.
Judges
Luthuli
Legal Topics
Unfair Dismissal, Trade Union Representation, Procedural Fairness, Substantive Fairness, Disciplinary Code, Dishonesty
Labour Law Unfair Dismissal Trade Union Representation Procedural Fairness Substantive Fairness Disciplinary Code Dishonesty

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 11 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ferroland Ground Trust (Pty) Ltd

Applicant

Commission For Conciliation Mediation And Arbitration

Respondent

Matloga N, N.O.

Respondent

Food and Allied Workers Union

Respondent

Lehong A

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Review Application / Judgment on Review of Arbitration Award

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the dismissal of Mr Lehong was procedurally unfair due to failure to inform and consult the trade union before instituting discipline against a shop steward.
  2. 2 Whether the dismissal of Mr Lehong was substantively unfair given the nature of the misconduct and the employer's disciplinary code.
  3. 3 Whether the arbitration award was reasonable and justified on the evidence before the Commissioner.

Ratio Decidendi

The Labour Court found that the Commissioner’s conclusion that the dismissal was procedurally unfair due to failure to inform and consult the trade union was unreasonable, as the Code of Good Practice serves as a guideline and does not confer legal rights. The Court held that non-compliance with the Code is not fatal unless it results in an unfair dismissal, and in this case, Mr Lehong was represented by his union during the appeal and arbitration, mitigating any procedural defect. On substantive fairness, the Court found that the Commissioner failed to properly balance the seriousness of the misconduct, namely dishonesty, against mitigating factors. The employer’s disciplinary code...

Court Disposition

The arbitration award is reviewed and set aside. The dismissal of the Fourth Respondent was procedurally and substantively fair.

Orders

  • The arbitration award under case number LP5459-20 is reviewed and set aside.
  • The arbitration award is substituted with the finding that the dismissal of the Fourth Respondent was procedurally and substantively fair.