Fesi and Another v Trustees Elect of the Ndabeni Communal Property Trust (411/2017, 412/2017) [2018] ZASCA 33; [2018] 2 All SA 617 (SCA) (27 March 2018)
The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the respondents were not validly elected as trustees in accordance with the trust deed, as the verification of eligible community members was incomplete and notices could not be properly served. The absence of a verified membership register meant that the annual general meeting could not be properly convened, and a quorum could not be determined. The Master was justified in refusing to issue letters of authority, given the pending litigation, unresolved concerns about the legality of the election, and the questionable conduct of the respondents and their attorney. The court emphasised the importance of compliance with statutory and constitutional...
- Citation
- [2018] ZASCA 33
- Parties
- Appellant: Fikiswa Fesi; Appellant: Master of the Western Cape High Court, Cape Town; Respondent: Trustees Elect of the Ndabeni Communal Property Trust (IT 1056/98)
- Court
- Supreme Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 27 March 2018
- Case Number
- 411/2017 & 412/2017
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Western Cape Division, Cape Town
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld. The order of the court below is set aside and substituted with dismissal of the application with costs, including costs of two counsel.
- Judges
- Navsa, Swain, Mbha, Pillay D, Schippers
- Legal Topics
- Trust Property Control Act, Land Restitution, Fiduciary Duties, Appointment of Trustees, Administrative Action, Community Beneficiaries
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Fikiswa Fesi
Appellant
Master of the Western Cape High Court, Cape Town
Appellant
Trustees Elect of the Ndabeni Communal Property Trust (IT 1056/98)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Western Cape Division, Cape Town
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the six respondents were lawfully elected as trustees in terms of the trust deed.
- 2 Whether the Master was correct in refusing to issue letters of authority to the respondents.
- 3 Whether the process for verifying community membership was properly followed.
Ratio Decidendi
The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the respondents were not validly elected as trustees in accordance with the trust deed, as the verification of eligible community members was incomplete and notices could not be properly served. The absence of a verified membership register meant that the annual general meeting could not be properly convened, and a quorum could not be determined. The Master was justified in refusing to issue letters of authority, given the pending litigation, unresolved concerns about the legality of the election, and the questionable conduct of the respondents and their attorney. The court emphasised the importance of compliance with statutory and constitutional...
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld. The order of the court below is set aside and substituted with dismissal of the application with costs, including costs of two counsel.
Orders
- The appeal is upheld with costs, including the costs of two counsel.
- The order of the court below is set aside and substituted as follows: 'The application is dismissed with costs including the costs of two counsel where so employed.'
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment