Fidelity Security Services (Pty) Ltd v SATAWU obo Richard and Others (JR2246/14) [2018] ZALCJHB 59 (1 February 2018)
The arbitrator's finding of substantive unfairness was not rationally connected to the evidence before her. The documentary evidence and admissions established that the individual respondents were offered alternative employment, which they refused, and that the dismissals were effected in accordance with the terms of their contracts after proper consultation. The arbitrator failed to consider this material evidence and provided inadequate reasons for her conclusion. The Labour Court, having all relevant material before it and in the interests of expeditious dispute resolution, substituted the arbitrator's award with a dismissal of the referral. The court also found that no order as to...
- Citation
- [2018] ZALCJHB 59
- Parties
- Applicant: Fidelity Security Services (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: SATAWU obo Zonke Richard & 5 Others; Respondent: CCMA; Respondent: Puleng Joyce Maduna N.O.
- Court
- Labour Court Johannesburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 1 February 2018
- Case Number
- JR2246/14
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Judgment on Review of Arbitration Award
- Outcome
- The review application succeeds; the arbitration award is set aside and substituted with a dismissal of the referral. No order as to costs.
- Judges
- Van Niekerk
- Legal Topics
- Unfair Dismissal, Review of Arbitration Award, Operational Requirements, Jurisdiction of Ccma, Remittal and Substitution, Costs in Labour Disputes
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Fidelity Security Services (Pty) Ltd
Applicant
SATAWU obo Zonke Richard & 5 Others
Respondent
CCMA
Respondent
Puleng Joyce Maduna N.O.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Judgment on Review of Arbitration Award
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the arbitrator's award finding substantive unfairness in the dismissal was rationally connected to the evidence.
- 2 Whether the arbitrator failed to consider material evidence regarding offers of alternative employment.
- 3 Whether the CCMA had jurisdiction to determine the dispute given the nature of the dismissals.
Ratio Decidendi
The arbitrator's finding of substantive unfairness was not rationally connected to the evidence before her. The documentary evidence and admissions established that the individual respondents were offered alternative employment, which they refused, and that the dismissals were effected in accordance with the terms of their contracts after proper consultation. The arbitrator failed to consider this material evidence and provided inadequate reasons for her conclusion. The Labour Court, having all relevant material before it and in the interests of expeditious dispute resolution, substituted the arbitrator's award with a dismissal of the referral. The court also found that no order as to...
Court Disposition
The review application succeeds; the arbitration award is set aside and substituted with a dismissal of the referral. No order as to costs.
Orders
- The arbitration award issued by the third respondent under case number GAEK 3250-11 on 8 September 2014 is reviewed and set aside.
- The award is substituted by the following: 'The applicants' referral is dismissed.'
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment