Filyat 4 CC t/a Ambient Control CC v Kimgas Refrigeration and Appliance Centre CC (1500/07) [2009] ZANCHC 9 (6 March 2009)

Filyat 4 CC t/a Ambient Control CC v Kimgas Refrigeration and Appliance Centre CC (1500/07) [2009] ZANCHC 9 (6 March 2009)

The court found that a valid contract existed between Ambient Control and Kimgas CC, with the payment to Kimgas CC being sufficiently determinable as between R5,000 and R10,000, depending on the smooth completion of the contract and unforeseen costs. The defendant's plea admitted the existence of a subcontracting agreement, and the evidence showed that the contract was only repudiated by the defendant on or about 29 October 2007. The plaintiff proved its damages, and the defendant's arguments regarding indeterminacy of the payment were rejected. The court held that the contract was breached by the defendant's repudiation and awarded damages to the plaintiff.

Citation
[2009] ZANCHC 9
Parties
Plaintiff: Filyat 4 CC t/a Ambient Control CC; Defendant: Kimgas Refrigeration and Appliance Centre CC
Court
Northern Cape High Court, Kimberley
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
6 March 2009
Case Number
1500/07
Procedural Posture
Civil Trial / Judgment After Trial
Outcome
Judgment for the plaintiff. Defendant ordered to pay damages and interest. Claim 2 granted by consent. Claim 3 abandoned with no order as to costs.
Judges
KGOMO
Legal Topics
Breach of Contract, Repudiation, Determinable Contract Terms, Subcontracting, Damages, Fronting
Commercial and Corporate Breach of Contract Repudiation Determinable Contract Terms Subcontracting Damages Fronting

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Filyat 4 CC t/a Ambient Control CC

Plaintiff

Kimgas Refrigeration and Appliance Centre CC

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Trial / Judgment After Trial

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether a valid contract existed between the parties.
  2. 2 Whether the contract was repudiated by the defendant.
  3. 3 Whether the amount payable to the defendant was sufficiently determined or determinable.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that a valid contract existed between Ambient Control and Kimgas CC, with the payment to Kimgas CC being sufficiently determinable as between R5,000 and R10,000, depending on the smooth completion of the contract and unforeseen costs. The defendant's plea admitted the existence of a subcontracting agreement, and the evidence showed that the contract was only repudiated by the defendant on or about 29 October 2007. The plaintiff proved its damages, and the defendant's arguments regarding indeterminacy of the payment were rejected. The court held that the contract was breached by the defendant's repudiation and awarded damages to the plaintiff.

Court Disposition

Judgment for the plaintiff. Defendant ordered to pay damages and interest. Claim 2 granted by consent. Claim 3 abandoned with no order as to costs.

Orders

  • The defendant is ordered to pay the plaintiff an amount of R129,231.22 plus interest at 15.5% from 7 December 2007 to date of payment.
  • The defendant is ordered to pay the plaintiff an amount of R23,166.20 plus interest at 15.5% from 7 December 2007 to date of payment.