First Rand Bank Ltd and Another v Azrapart (Pty) Ltd and Another (4437/2024) [2025] ZAFSHC 162 (5 June 2025)

First Rand Bank Ltd and Another v Azrapart (Pty) Ltd and Another (4437/2024) [2025] ZAFSHC 162 (5 June 2025)

The court found that the first respondent is financially distressed, owing R2.3 billion to the applicants and unable to pay. Despite repeated opportunities and extensions, the first respondent failed to provide credible proof that the R2.6 billion capital injection from Redcore Hospitality Holdings Limited would materialize. The documents and letters submitted were either repetitions of previous evidence or lacked the necessary certainty and bank guarantees. The applicants' independent investigation revealed that Redcore's financial statements showed no turnover and no employees, casting doubt on its ability to provide the funds. The court concluded that, on a balance of probabilities,...

Citation
[2025] ZAFSHC 162
Parties
Applicant: First Rand Bank Ltd (acting through its Rand Merchant Bank Division); Applicant: Investec Bank Ltd; Respondent: Azrapart (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: The Companies and Intellectual Property Commission
Court
Free State High Court, Bloemfontein
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
5 June 2025
Case Number
4437/2024
Procedural Posture
Business Rescue Application / Final Determination After Supplementary Affidavits
Outcome
Application granted; first respondent placed under supervision and business rescue proceedings commenced.
Judges
Loubser
Legal Topics
Business Rescue, Financial Distress, Companies Act 71 of 2008, Capital Injection, Security Enforcement
Commercial and Corporate Civil Procedure Business Rescue Financial Distress Companies Act 71 of 2008 Capital Injection Security Enforcement

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

First Rand Bank Ltd (acting through its Rand Merchant Bank Division)

Applicant

Investec Bank Ltd

Applicant

Azrapart (Pty) Ltd

Respondent

The Companies and Intellectual Property Commission

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Business Rescue Application / Final Determination After Supplementary Affidavits

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the first respondent is financially distressed and should be placed under business rescue proceedings.
  2. 2 Whether the prospect of a R2.6 billion capital injection from Redcore Hospitality Holdings Limited negates the need for business rescue.
  3. 3 Whether sufficient proof of imminent payment by Redcore has been provided to avoid business rescue.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the first respondent is financially distressed, owing R2.3 billion to the applicants and unable to pay. Despite repeated opportunities and extensions, the first respondent failed to provide credible proof that the R2.6 billion capital injection from Redcore Hospitality Holdings Limited would materialize. The documents and letters submitted were either repetitions of previous evidence or lacked the necessary certainty and bank guarantees. The applicants' independent investigation revealed that Redcore's financial statements showed no turnover and no employees, casting doubt on its ability to provide the funds. The court concluded that, on a balance of probabilities,...

Court Disposition

Application granted; first respondent placed under supervision and business rescue proceedings commenced.

Orders

  • The first respondent is placed under supervision and business rescue proceedings are commenced in respect of the first respondent in terms of s 131 of the Companies Act 71 of 2008.
  • Piers Michael Marsden and Lance Schapiro are appointed as the joint interim business rescue practitioners of the first respondent.