Fish v S (A166/2013) [2013] ZAFSHC 190 (23 December 2013)

Fish v S (A166/2013) [2013] ZAFSHC 190 (23 December 2013)

The appeal court found that the trial court erred in rejecting the appellant's version as not reasonably possibly true. The evidence established that the deceased, a police officer, was in possession of a firearm at the time of the incident and that the appellant's account of acting in self-defence during a struggle over the weapon was supported by both her testimony and the circumstances. The trial court's findings were based on speculation rather than substantive evidence, particularly regarding the manner in which the fatal wound was inflicted. The appellant's explanation that the stabbing occurred accidentally during the struggle was consistent with the physical evidence and not...

Citation
[2013] ZAFSHC 190
Parties
Appellant: Disebo Sannah Fish; Respondent: The State
Court
Free State High Court, Bloemfontein
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
23 December 2013
Case Number
A166/2013
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence
Outcome
Appeal upheld; conviction and sentence set aside.
Judges
Van Zyl, R, Reinders, WND R
Legal Topics
Self Defence, Onus of Proof, Intent, Evaluation of Evidence
Criminal Law Self Defence Onus of Proof Intent Evaluation of Evidence

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Disebo Sannah Fish

Appellant

The State

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the appellant acted in self-defence when the deceased was stabbed.
  2. 2 Whether the State proved beyond reasonable doubt that the appellant had the intent to kill.
  3. 3 Whether the trial court erred in rejecting the appellant's version as not reasonably possibly true.

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal court found that the trial court erred in rejecting the appellant's version as not reasonably possibly true. The evidence established that the deceased, a police officer, was in possession of a firearm at the time of the incident and that the appellant's account of acting in self-defence during a struggle over the weapon was supported by both her testimony and the circumstances. The trial court's findings were based on speculation rather than substantive evidence, particularly regarding the manner in which the fatal wound was inflicted. The appellant's explanation that the stabbing occurred accidentally during the struggle was consistent with the physical evidence and not...

Court Disposition

Appeal upheld; conviction and sentence set aside.

Orders

  • The appeal succeeds.
  • The conviction and sentence imposed by the trial court are set aside.