Fisher and Another v President of the Republic of South Africa and Another (15572 / 2007) [2008] ZAWCHC 18; [2008] 4 All SA 189 (C) (20 March 2008)
The court found that the Minister's decision to suspend commercial abalone fishing was a reasonable exercise of emergency powers under section 16 of the Marine Living Resources Act. The evidence established that the abalone fishery was in a state of emergency due to drastic stock declines from poaching and ecological changes. The decision-making process was thorough, sequential, and based on expert scientific advice. The applicants failed to provide independent scientific evidence to challenge the existence of an emergency or the validity of the Minister's actions. The court held that the Minister's powers included indefinite suspension and that the decision was not irrational, arbitrary,...
- Citation
- [2008] ZAWCHC 18
- Parties
- Applicant: Oscar Delmore Fisher; Applicant: South African Abalone Industry Association; Respondent: President of the Republic of South Africa; Respondent: Minister of Environmental Affairs and Tourism
- Court
- Western Cape High Court, Cape Town
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 20 March 2008
- Case Number
- 15572 / 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Final Judgment After Review of Administrative Action
- Outcome
- Application dismissed; costs awarded to respondents from 23 November 2007 onwards, including costs of two counsel.
- Judges
- Bozalek
- Legal Topics
- Promotion of Administrative Justice Act, Marine Living Resources Act, Emergency Measures, Judicial Review, Total Allowable Catch, Ministerial Discretion
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Oscar Delmore Fisher
Applicant
South African Abalone Industry Association
Applicant
President of the Republic of South Africa
Respondent
Minister of Environmental Affairs and Tourism
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Final Judgment After Review of Administrative Action
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Minister's decision to suspend commercial abalone fishing constituted a valid exercise of emergency powers under section 16 of the Marine Living Resources Act.
- 2 Whether the state of the abalone fishery amounted to an 'emergency' justifying indefinite suspension.
- 3 Whether the decision-making process was procedurally fair and based on relevant scientific advice.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the Minister's decision to suspend commercial abalone fishing was a reasonable exercise of emergency powers under section 16 of the Marine Living Resources Act. The evidence established that the abalone fishery was in a state of emergency due to drastic stock declines from poaching and ecological changes. The decision-making process was thorough, sequential, and based on expert scientific advice. The applicants failed to provide independent scientific evidence to challenge the existence of an emergency or the validity of the Minister's actions. The court held that the Minister's powers included indefinite suspension and that the decision was not irrational, arbitrary,...
Court Disposition
Application dismissed; costs awarded to respondents from 23 November 2007 onwards, including costs of two counsel.
Orders
- The application is dismissed.
- Respondents are awarded costs with effect from 23 November 2007 onwards, including the costs of two counsel.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment