Fisher obo TS.M and Another v Road Accident Fund (2010 /34001) [2023] ZAGPJHC 160 (14 February 2023)
The court found that Adv Fisher's prior involvement as counsel for the plaintiff in the same matter compromised his independence as curator ad litem, rendering him unable to impartially scrutinize the actions and fees of the attorneys. The handling of the general damages award by the plaintiff's attorneys was marred by irregularities, including the absence of a contingency fee agreement, lack of proper accounting, and questionable execution of special powers of attorney. The court emphasized that the curator ad litem must be manifestly independent and that any association with the attorneys undermines this requirement. Consequently, the orders appointing Adv Fisher as curator ad litem and...
- Citation
- [2023] ZAGPJHC 160
- Parties
- Plaintiff: TS.M; Applicant: Adv Michael Alex Fisher; Defendant: Road Accident Fund
- Court
- South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 14 February 2023
- Case Number
- 2010 /34001
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Trial / Rescission and Removal of Curator Ad Litem; Post Quantum Determination
- Outcome
- The order appointing Adv Michael Fisher as curator ad litem is rescinded and set aside due to compromised independence. The conduct of the attorneys and curator is referred to the Legal Practice Council and General Bar Council for investigation. A new curator ad litem fluent in IsiZulu is to be nominated. Further...
- Judges
- L Flatela
- Legal Topics
- Curator Ad Litem Appointment, Rescission of Order, Road Accident Fund Claim, Attorney Fee Dispute, Special Power of Attorney, Mental Incapacity
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
TS.M
Plaintiff
Adv Michael Alex Fisher
Applicant
Road Accident Fund
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Trial / Rescission and Removal of Curator Ad Litem; Post Quantum Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appointment of Adv Fisher as curator ad litem should be rescinded due to compromised independence.
- 2 Whether the conduct of the plaintiff's attorney and curator ad litem warrants referral to regulatory bodies for investigation.
- 3 Whether the plaintiff's mother understood and validly executed the special power of attorney and fee agreements.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that Adv Fisher's prior involvement as counsel for the plaintiff in the same matter compromised his independence as curator ad litem, rendering him unable to impartially scrutinize the actions and fees of the attorneys. The handling of the general damages award by the plaintiff's attorneys was marred by irregularities, including the absence of a contingency fee agreement, lack of proper accounting, and questionable execution of special powers of attorney. The court emphasized that the curator ad litem must be manifestly independent and that any association with the attorneys undermines this requirement. Consequently, the orders appointing Adv Fisher as curator ad litem and...
Court Disposition
The order appointing Adv Michael Fisher as curator ad litem is rescinded and set aside due to compromised independence. The conduct of the attorneys and curator is referred to the Legal Practice Council and General Bar Council for investigation. A new curator ad litem fluent in IsiZulu is to be nominated. Further...
Orders
- The order granted on 20 October 2022 appointing Adv Michael Alex Fisher as curator ad litem is rescinded and set aside.
- Adv Fisher is removed as curator ad litem acting on behalf of the plaintiff.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment