Fonjana v Multilateral Motor Vehicle Accident Fund and Another (19/03) [2004] ZASCA 53; [2004] 3 All SA 399 (SCA); 2005 (1) SA 26 (SCA) (28 May 2004)

Fonjana v Multilateral Motor Vehicle Accident Fund and Another (19/03) [2004] ZASCA 53; [2004] 3 All SA 399 (SCA); 2005 (1) SA 26 (SCA) (28 May 2004)

The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the phrase 'rendering military service' in Article 46 of the Motor Vehicle Accident Fund Act 93 of 1989 is not confined to active or combat service. Permanent membership in the South African National Defence Force is sufficient to satisfy the requirement, as the legislative history and statutory context do not support a restrictive interpretation. The court rejected the respondent's argument that a connection between the journey and military service is necessary, finding that the statutory language refers to any period during which military service is rendered. The purpose of the exception is to protect both soldiers and motorists who provide...

Citation
[2004] ZASCA 53
Parties
Appellant: Jongisile Fonjana; Respondent: Multilateral Motor Vehicle Accident Fund; Respondent: Road Accident Fund
Court
Supreme Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
28 May 2004
Case Number
19/03
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Ciskei High Court
Outcome
Appeal upheld with costs. The order of the court a quo is set aside and replaced.
Judges
Mpati DP, Marais JA, Brand JA, Jones AJA, Ponnan AJA
Legal Topics
Motor Vehicle Accident Fund Act, Passenger Claim Limitation, Military Service Exception, Statutory Interpretation
Civil Procedure Delict Motor Vehicle Accident Fund Act Passenger Claim Limitation Military Service Exception Statutory Interpretation

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 11 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Jongisile Fonjana

Appellant

Multilateral Motor Vehicle Accident Fund

Respondent

Road Accident Fund

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From Ciskei High Court

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether permanent membership of the South African National Defence Force constitutes 'rendering military service' under Article 46 of the Motor Vehicle Accident Fund Act 93 of 1989.
  2. 2 Whether the appellant is exempted from the statutory limitation on passenger claims due to his military status.
  3. 3 Whether a connection between the conveyance and military service is required for the exception to apply.

Ratio Decidendi

The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the phrase 'rendering military service' in Article 46 of the Motor Vehicle Accident Fund Act 93 of 1989 is not confined to active or combat service. Permanent membership in the South African National Defence Force is sufficient to satisfy the requirement, as the legislative history and statutory context do not support a restrictive interpretation. The court rejected the respondent's argument that a connection between the journey and military service is necessary, finding that the statutory language refers to any period during which military service is rendered. The purpose of the exception is to protect both soldiers and motorists who provide...

Court Disposition

Appeal upheld with costs. The order of the court a quo is set aside and replaced.

Orders

  • The plaintiff is exempted from the limitations imposed on a passenger by Article 46 of the Schedule to Act 93 of 1989.
  • The second defendant is ordered to pay the plaintiff's costs.