Food and Allied Workers Union and Another v Commission for Conciliation and Arbitration and Others (P167/17) [2022] ZALCPE 2 (3 February 2022)
The court found that the delay in filing the review application was caused by internal union conflict and the death of the responsible official, circumstances beyond the individual applicants control. It would be unjust to deny them the right to be heard due to their unions conduct, and the prejudice to the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2022] ZALCPE 2
- Parties
- Applicant: Food and Allied Workers Union; Applicant: Butshingi, N & 17 Others; Respondent: Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration; Respondent: Commissioner Mbuli; Respondent: Coca Cola Fortune (Pty) Ltd
- Court
- Labour Court Port Elizabeth
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 3 February 2022
- Case Number
- P167/17
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Judgment
- Outcome
- Condonation for late filing granted; review application dismissed; no order as to costs.
- Judges
- Lallie
- Legal Topics
- Fixed Term Contracts, Collective Agreements, Unfair Dismissal, Section 198b Lra, Condonation of Late Filing
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Food and Allied Workers Union
Applicant
Butshingi, N & 17 Others
Applicant
Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration
Respondent
Commissioner Mbuli
Respondent
Coca Cola Fortune (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the late filing of the review application should be condoned.
- 2 Whether the commissioners arbitration award was wrong in dismissing the applicants claim.
- 3 Whether the collective agreement between FAWU and the third respondent lawfully terminated the applicants contracts.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the delay in filing the review application was caused by internal union conflict and the death of the responsible official, circumstances beyond the individual applicants control. It would be unjust to deny them the right to be heard due to their unions conduct, and the prejudice to the applicants outweighed any prejudice to the third respondent. Condonation was therefore granted. On the merits, the court held that the applicants contracts were terminated in accordance with the collective agreement, which was concluded before section 198B of the LRA became operational. Section 198B(2)(c) expressly excludes its application where a collective agreement permits fixed...
Court Disposition
Condonation for late filing granted; review application dismissed; no order as to costs.
Orders
- The late filing of the application for review is condoned.
- The application for review is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment