Fotheringham v Road Accident Fund (70534/2013) [2016] ZAGPPHC 365 (23 May 2016)
The court held that the proceeds from the sale of the plaintiff's business did not accrue as a direct consequence of the accident and therefore do not constitute a deductible benefit from the damages recoverable under the Road Accident Fund Act. The payments received were for the sale of the business, not for work performed or commission, and would have been received even if the accident had not occurred. Deducting these proceeds would unduly reduce the plaintiff's patrimony and would be unreasonable and inequitable. The plaintiff's loss is the loss of income in the form of his monthly salary that he would have earned but for the accident. The defendant conceded to the plaintiff's...
- Citation
- [2016] ZAGPPHC 365
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Christopher Thomas Fotheringham; Defendant: Road Accident Fund
- Court
- North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 23 May 2016
- Case Number
- 70534/2013
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Trial / Quantum of Damages
- Outcome
- Judgment granted in favour of the plaintiff for payment of damages, interest, undertaking for future medical expenses, and costs.
- Judges
- Nonyane
- Legal Topics
- Road Accident Fund Act, Quantum of Damages, Mitigation of Loss, Deductible Benefits
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Christopher Thomas Fotheringham
Plaintiff
Road Accident Fund
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Trial / Quantum of Damages
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the proceeds from the sale of the plaintiff's business constitute a deductible benefit from damages recoverable under the Road Accident Fund Act.
- 2 Whether the plaintiff proved past loss of income resulting from the accident.
- 3 Whether the defendant is liable for future loss of earnings and medical expenses.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the proceeds from the sale of the plaintiff's business did not accrue as a direct consequence of the accident and therefore do not constitute a deductible benefit from the damages recoverable under the Road Accident Fund Act. The payments received were for the sale of the business, not for work performed or commission, and would have been received even if the accident had not occurred. Deducting these proceeds would unduly reduce the plaintiff's patrimony and would be unreasonable and inequitable. The plaintiff's loss is the loss of income in the form of his monthly salary that he would have earned but for the accident. The defendant conceded to the plaintiff's...
Court Disposition
Judgment granted in favour of the plaintiff for payment of damages, interest, undertaking for future medical expenses, and costs.
Orders
- Judgment is granted in favour of the plaintiff for payment of the sum of R2 694 776.00 within 30 days from the date of this order.
- The defendant is ordered to pay interest on the sum of R2 694 776.00 at the rate of 9% from 31 days after the date of this order to date of payment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment