Fotheringham v Road Accident Fund (70534/2013) [2016] ZAGPPHC 365 (23 May 2016)

Fotheringham v Road Accident Fund (70534/2013) [2016] ZAGPPHC 365 (23 May 2016)

The court held that the proceeds from the sale of the plaintiff's business did not accrue as a direct consequence of the accident and therefore do not constitute a deductible benefit from the damages recoverable under the Road Accident Fund Act. The payments received were for the sale of the business, not for work performed or commission, and would have been received even if the accident had not occurred. Deducting these proceeds would unduly reduce the plaintiff's patrimony and would be unreasonable and inequitable. The plaintiff's loss is the loss of income in the form of his monthly salary that he would have earned but for the accident. The defendant conceded to the plaintiff's...

Citation
[2016] ZAGPPHC 365
Parties
Plaintiff: Christopher Thomas Fotheringham; Defendant: Road Accident Fund
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
23 May 2016
Case Number
70534/2013
Procedural Posture
Civil Trial / Quantum of Damages
Outcome
Judgment granted in favour of the plaintiff for payment of damages, interest, undertaking for future medical expenses, and costs.
Judges
Nonyane
Legal Topics
Road Accident Fund Act, Quantum of Damages, Mitigation of Loss, Deductible Benefits

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Christopher Thomas Fotheringham

Plaintiff

Road Accident Fund

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Trial / Quantum of Damages

  1. 1 Whether the proceeds from the sale of the plaintiff's business constitute a deductible benefit from damages recoverable under the Road Accident Fund Act.
  2. 2 Whether the plaintiff proved past loss of income resulting from the accident.
  3. 3 Whether the defendant is liable for future loss of earnings and medical expenses.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the proceeds from the sale of the plaintiff's business did not accrue as a direct consequence of the accident and therefore do not constitute a deductible benefit from the damages recoverable under the Road Accident Fund Act. The payments received were for the sale of the business, not for work performed or commission, and would have been received even if the accident had not occurred. Deducting these proceeds would unduly reduce the plaintiff's patrimony and would be unreasonable and inequitable. The plaintiff's loss is the loss of income in the form of his monthly salary that he would have earned but for the accident. The defendant conceded to the plaintiff's...

Court Disposition

Judgment granted in favour of the plaintiff for payment of damages, interest, undertaking for future medical expenses, and costs.

Orders

  • Judgment is granted in favour of the plaintiff for payment of the sum of R2 694 776.00 within 30 days from the date of this order.
  • The defendant is ordered to pay interest on the sum of R2 694 776.00 at the rate of 9% from 31 days after the date of this order to date of payment.