Frantrade Nineteen (Pty) Limited and Others Realty Corporation of South Africa Limited and Others (20400/2018) [2019] ZAGPJHC 313 (22 February 2019)
The court held that the restrictive condition registered against the title deed constitutes a personal servitude, which upon registration becomes a real right in favour of the respondent. The applicants, as owners, are not beneficiaries as defined in the Immovable Property (Removal or Modification of Restrictions) Act, 94 of 1965, since their interest arises from ownership and not from a will or other testamentary instrument. The Act does not confer standing on owners to seek removal of such restrictions; only beneficiaries under a will or testamentary instrument may do so. The court lacks inherent jurisdiction to remove or vary the restrictive condition without the consent of all...
- Citation
- [2019] ZAGPJHC 313
- Parties
- Applicant: Frantrade Nineteen (Pty) Limited; Applicant: John Joseph Welch; Applicant: Geoffrey Cornelis Meter; Applicant: Beverley Ann Dunn; Respondent: Realty Corporation of South Africa Limited; Respondent: Evan Paul Dryen; Respondent: Candice Lynn Dryden; Respondent: Gareth Dryden; Respondent: The Master of the High Court Johannesburg; Respondent: The Registrar of Deeds Pretoria; Respondent: Midvaal Municipality
- Court
- South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 22 February 2019
- Case Number
- 20400/2018
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Opposed Motion; Judgment on Merits
- Outcome
- Application dismissed with costs, including costs of senior counsel.
- Judges
- Twala ML
- Legal Topics
- Restrictive Conditions, Personal Servitude, Title Deed Registration, Locus Standi, Removal of Restrictions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Frantrade Nineteen (Pty) Limited
Applicant
John Joseph Welch
Applicant
Geoffrey Cornelis Meter
Applicant
Beverley Ann Dunn
Applicant
Realty Corporation of South Africa Limited
Respondent
Evan Paul Dryen
Respondent
Candice Lynn Dryden
Respondent
Gareth Dryden
Respondent
The Master of the High Court Johannesburg
Respondent
The Registrar of Deeds Pretoria
Respondent
Midvaal Municipality
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Opposed Motion; Judgment on Merits
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the restrictive condition on the title deed can be removed without the consent of the beneficiary.
- 2 Whether the applicants have locus standi under the Immovable Property (Removal or Modification of Restrictions) Act, 94 of 1965.
- 3 Whether the restrictive condition constitutes a personal servitude and if so, whether it confers a real right.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the restrictive condition registered against the title deed constitutes a personal servitude, which upon registration becomes a real right in favour of the respondent. The applicants, as owners, are not beneficiaries as defined in the Immovable Property (Removal or Modification of Restrictions) Act, 94 of 1965, since their interest arises from ownership and not from a will or other testamentary instrument. The Act does not confer standing on owners to seek removal of such restrictions; only beneficiaries under a will or testamentary instrument may do so. The court lacks inherent jurisdiction to remove or vary the restrictive condition without the consent of all...
Court Disposition
Application dismissed with costs, including costs of senior counsel.
Orders
- The application is dismissed.
- The applicants are liable to pay the costs of the respondents jointly and severally, the one paying the other to be absolved, including the costs of senior counsel.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment