Freight Dynamics v South African Transport & Allied Workers Union and Others (J2540/08) [2009] ZALC 230 (4 November 2009)
The Court found that the strike action commenced by the individual respondents on 24 November 2008 was premature and did not comply with the strike notice requirements. The demands made during the strike were not referred to conciliation, and the nature of the dispute related to section 197 of the Labour Relations Act, which must be adjudicated by the Labour Court and not resolved by strike action. The notice of strike was invalid as it was issued by attorneys not party to the dispute. The respondents' denial of participation in the strike was contradicted by documentary evidence and their own attorney's admissions. The interim interdict was therefore confirmed, and costs were awarded...
- Citation
- [2009] ZALC 230
- Parties
- Applicant: Freight Dynamics; Respondent: South African Transport & Allied Workers Union; Respondent: United Transport & Allied Workers Union; Respondent: United Workers Association of SA; Respondent: The persons listed in Annexure 'A'; Respondent: The persons listed in Annexure 'B'
- Court
- Labour Court
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 4 November 2009
- Case Number
- J2540/08
- Procedural Posture
- Urgent Application / Return Day of Rule Nisi; Confirmation of Interim Interdict
- Outcome
- Interim order confirmed with costs against the respondents.
- Judges
- Francis
- Legal Topics
- Unprotected Strike, Interdict, Section 197 Transfer, Strike Notice Requirements, Costs Order
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Freight Dynamics
Applicant
South African Transport & Allied Workers Union
Respondent
United Transport & Allied Workers Union
Respondent
United Workers Association of SA
Respondent
The persons listed in Annexure 'A'
Respondent
The persons listed in Annexure 'B'
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Return Day of Rule Nisi; Confirmation of Interim Interdict
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the strike action commenced by the individual respondents on 24 November 2008 was protected under the Labour Relations Act.
- 2 Whether the demands made by the respondents during the strike were properly referred to conciliation.
- 3 Whether the applicant is entitled to confirmation of the interim interdict restraining the respondents from participating in the strike.
Ratio Decidendi
The Court found that the strike action commenced by the individual respondents on 24 November 2008 was premature and did not comply with the strike notice requirements. The demands made during the strike were not referred to conciliation, and the nature of the dispute related to section 197 of the Labour Relations Act, which must be adjudicated by the Labour Court and not resolved by strike action. The notice of strike was invalid as it was issued by attorneys not party to the dispute. The respondents' denial of participation in the strike was contradicted by documentary evidence and their own attorney's admissions. The interim interdict was therefore confirmed, and costs were awarded...
Court Disposition
Interim order confirmed with costs against the respondents.
Orders
- The interim order granted on 27 November 2008 is confirmed with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment