Freight Dynamics v South African Transport & Allied Workers Union and Others (J2540/08) [2009] ZALCJHB 87 (4 November 2009)
The court found that the strike action commenced by the individual respondents on 24 November 2008 was premature and did not comply with the statutory strike notice issued for 26 November 2008. The demands made during the strike were not conciliated, and the dispute referred to the bargaining council was characterized as an unfair labour practice relating to section 197, which should have been resolved by arbitration or adjudication, not by strike action. The respondents' denial of participation in the strike was contradicted by documentary evidence, including a memorandum of understanding signed on 24 November 2008. The court held that the strike was unprotected and confirmed the interim...
- Citation
- [2009] ZALCJHB 87
- Parties
- Applicant: Freight Dynamics; Respondent: South African Transport & Allied Workers Union; Respondent: United Transport & Allied Workers Union; Respondent: United Workers Association of SA; Respondent: The persons listed in Annexure 'A'; Respondent: The persons listed in Annexure 'B'
- Court
- Labour Court Johannesburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 4 November 2009
- Case Number
- J2540/08
- Procedural Posture
- Urgent Application / Return Day of Rule Nisi; Confirmation of Interim Interdict
- Outcome
- Interim order confirmed; strike declared unprotected; costs awarded against respondents.
- Judges
- Francis
- Legal Topics
- Unprotected Strike, Interdict, Section 197 Transfer, Strike Notice Requirements, Costs Order
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Freight Dynamics
Applicant
South African Transport & Allied Workers Union
Respondent
United Transport & Allied Workers Union
Respondent
United Workers Association of SA
Respondent
The persons listed in Annexure 'A'
Respondent
The persons listed in Annexure 'B'
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Return Day of Rule Nisi; Confirmation of Interim Interdict
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the strike action commenced by the individual respondents on 24 November 2008 was protected under the Labour Relations Act.
- 2 Whether the applicant is entitled to confirmation of the interim interdict restraining the respondents from participating in the strike.
- 3 Whether the respondents complied with statutory requirements for a protected strike, including proper notice and conciliation of the dispute.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the strike action commenced by the individual respondents on 24 November 2008 was premature and did not comply with the statutory strike notice issued for 26 November 2008. The demands made during the strike were not conciliated, and the dispute referred to the bargaining council was characterized as an unfair labour practice relating to section 197, which should have been resolved by arbitration or adjudication, not by strike action. The respondents' denial of participation in the strike was contradicted by documentary evidence, including a memorandum of understanding signed on 24 November 2008. The court held that the strike was unprotected and confirmed the interim...
Court Disposition
Interim order confirmed; strike declared unprotected; costs awarded against respondents.
Orders
- The interim order granted on 27 November 2008 is confirmed with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment