FSV Properties CC v City of Johannesburg (09/22830) [2012] ZAGPJHC 44 (9 March 2012)

FSV Properties CC v City of Johannesburg (09/22830) [2012] ZAGPJHC 44 (9 March 2012)

The court found that the defendant's reliance on lower valuations for expropriation purposes, while simultaneously using higher municipal valuations for rating and revenue extraction, was unjustified and inconsistent. The municipal valuations as at July 2007 were still operative at the time of expropriation in February 2009, and no valid reason was provided to deviate from these values. The court rejected the independent valuer's report due to lack of explanation for the discrepancies and insufficient consideration of relevant factors. Accordingly, compensation was awarded based on the municipal valuations, with the statutory 5% addition, less payments already made, and interest from the...

Citation
[2012] ZAGPJHC 44
Parties
Plaintiff: FSV Properties CC; Defendant: City of Johannesburg
Court
South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
9 March 2012
Case Number
09/22830
Procedural Posture
Civil Trial / Judgment After Trial
Outcome
Judgment granted in favour of the plaintiff for compensation based on municipal valuations, plus interest and costs.
Judges
Satchwell
Legal Topics
Expropriation, Compensation for Expropriation, Municipal Valuation, Market Value, Interest on Compensation
Land and Property Civil Procedure Expropriation Compensation for Expropriation Municipal Valuation Market Value Interest on Compensation

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Sign in to unlock

Parties

FSV Properties CC

Plaintiff

City of Johannesburg

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Trial / Judgment After Trial

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether compensation for expropriation should be based on municipal valuation or independent valuer's assessment.
  2. 2 Whether the defendant may rely on a lower valuation for expropriation than for municipal rates.
  3. 3 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to interest and costs on the outstanding compensation.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the defendant's reliance on lower valuations for expropriation purposes, while simultaneously using higher municipal valuations for rating and revenue extraction, was unjustified and inconsistent. The municipal valuations as at July 2007 were still operative at the time of expropriation in February 2009, and no valid reason was provided to deviate from these values. The court rejected the independent valuer's report due to lack of explanation for the discrepancies and insufficient consideration of relevant factors. Accordingly, compensation was awarded based on the municipal valuations, with the statutory 5% addition, less payments already made, and interest from the...

Court Disposition

Judgment granted in favour of the plaintiff for compensation based on municipal valuations, plus interest and costs.

Orders

  • Defendant to pay plaintiff the total sum of R374,800.00.
  • Defendant to pay interest on the aforesaid amount at 8.5% per annum from 18 February 2009 to date of final payment.