Futuregrowth Asset Management (Pty) Ltd v Fruitone Holdings (Pty) Ltd (LM047May22) [2022] ZACT 20 (3 August 2022)
- Citation
- [2022] ZACT 20
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Court
- Competition Tribunal
- Panel
- Yasmin Carrim, Thando Vilakazi, Liberty Mncube
- Case number
- LM047May22
More details
- Court
- Competition Tribunal
- Panel
- Yasmin Carrim, Thando Vilakazi, Liberty Mncube
- Case number
- LM047May22
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The Tribunal found that the proposed transaction would not substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market, as the combined market shares of the merging parties are low in both the upstream and downstream citrus markets. There are no vertical overlaps between the parties. The transaction does not raise any public interest concerns, as there will be no merger-specific retrenchments or job losses, and employee representatives and trade unions did not raise any objections. The acquiring group demonstrates significant B-BBEE credentials, while the target group does not have historically disadvantaged shareholders. Accordingly, the Tribunal approved the merger unconditionally.
Court disposition
Merger unconditionally approved.
Orders
- The large merger between Futuregrowth Asset Management (Pty) Ltd (acting as agent for Old Mutual Life Insurance Company) and Fruitone Holdings (Pty) Ltd is unconditionally approved.
02
Material facts
Parties
Futuregrowth Asset Management (Pty) Ltd (acting as agent for Old Mutual Life Insurance Company)
Applicant Counsel: Susan Meyer and Preanka GoundenFruitone Holdings (Pty) Ltd
RespondentAmounts and remedies
- OMLACSA Intended Shareholding in Fruitone (post Transaction): ZAR 18.75
- OM Black Owned Voting Rights Percentage: ZAR 39.47
- OM Black Economic Interest Percentage: ZAR 28.79
- Futuregrowth Black Management Trust Ownership Percentage: ZAR 5.9
- Futuregrowth Black Educational Trust Ownership Percentage: ZAR 5.3
03
Procedural history
Posture
Large Merger Review / Decision on Merger Approval
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether the proposed transaction will substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market.
- 02
Whether the transaction raises any public interest concerns, including employment and spread of ownership.
Party arguments
- Applicant
- The merging parties argued that the transaction would not result in any merger-specific retrenchments or job losses. They submitted that the combined market shares in both the upstream and downstream citrus markets are low and that the transaction would not negatively affect competition or public interest. They also highlighted the B-BBEE credentials of the acquiring group.
- Respondent
- The Competition Commission found that there are horizontal overlaps in the cultivation and sale of citrus fruits, but the combined market shares are low in both national and regional markets. No vertical overlap was identified. The Commission received no concerns from employee representatives or trade unions and concluded that the transaction does not raise competition or public interest concerns.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Section 12A of the Competition Act, 89 of 1998
A merger may only be prohibited if it is likely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market, or if it raises significant public interest concerns.
- 02
Competition Commission’s Large Merger Report 2022MAY0037
The assessment of market shares and competitive effects must consider both national and regional markets, as well as upstream and downstream activities.
- 03
Section 12A(3) of the Competition Act, 89 of 1998
Public interest factors include employment, the ability of small businesses to compete, and the promotion of a greater spread of ownership, particularly to historically disadvantaged persons.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The Tribunal found that the proposed transaction would not substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market, as the combined market shares of the merging parties are low in both the upstream and downstream citrus markets. There are no vertical overlaps between the parties. The transaction does not raise any public interest concerns, as there will be no merger-specific retrenchments or job losses, and employee representatives and trade unions did not raise any objections. The acquiring group demonstrates significant B-BBEE credentials, while the target group does not have historically disadvantaged shareholders. Accordingly, the Tribunal approved the merger unconditionally.
Obiter and limits
- The Tribunal noted the importance of ongoing engagement with employee representatives and trade unions in merger proceedings.
- The Tribunal observed that the spread of ownership remains a relevant consideration, even where the target group does not have historically disadvantaged shareholders.
Court disposition
Merger unconditionally approved.
- The large merger between Futuregrowth Asset Management (Pty) Ltd (acting as agent for Old Mutual Life Insurance Company) and Fruitone Holdings (Pty) Ltd is unconditionally approved.
Source and reliance status
Competition Tribunal
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
Competition Tribunal
Judgment
COMPETITION TRIBUNAL OF
SOUTH AFRICA
Case no: LM047May22
In the large merger between:
Futuregrowth Asset Management (Pty) Ltd
(acting as agent for Old Mutual Life Insurance Company) Primary Acquiring Firm
And
Fruitone Holdings (Pty) Ltd Primary
Target Firm
Heard on: 2
August 2022
Order issued on: 2 August 2022
REASONS FOR DECISION
[1] On 2 August 2022, the Competition Tribunal (“Tribunal”) unconditionally approved the large merger between Futuregrowth Asset Management (Pty) Ltd ("Futuregrowth"), acting as an agent for Old Mutual Life Assurance Company (South Africa) Ltd (“OMLACSA”) and Fruitone Holdings (Pty) Ltd ("Fruitone").
[2] In terms of the proposed transaction, OMLACSA intends to subscribe for 18.75% of the entire issued share capital of Fruitone. As a result, OMLACSA (via Futuregrowth) will exercise joint control over Fruitone.[1]
[3] Futuregrowth is wholly owned by Old Mutual Investment Group Holdings (Pty) Ltd (“OMIG”), a company incorporated in accordance with the laws of South Africa. OMIG is ultimately held by Old Mutual Ltd (“OM”).[2] All firms directly and indirectly controlled by OM will be referred to as the “Acquiring Group”.
[4] The Acquiring Group is an international long-term savings, insurance, banking, and investment group which provides various financial
products and services. Relevant to the proposed transaction is the Futuregrowth Agri-Fund (“Agri-Fund”), which specialises in the investment of agricultural land, biological assets, agricultural infrastructure, and other related farming implements. The Agri-Fund owns citrus farms in various provinces[3] in South Africa through Agri-Fund 1, Agri-Fund 2, and Safe Farm ventures (Pty) Ltd (“SFV”). Agri-Fund’s farms are typically leased to third party operators to manage and run.
[5] Fruitone is a private company incorporated in accordance with the laws of South Africa. Fruitone does not control any firms in South Africa and is wholly owned by Boyes Group Holdings (Pty) Ltd ("Holdco"). Holdco is in turn owned by the following trusts: [....] Fruitone and all the firms controlled directly and indirectly by it, are collectively referred to as the "Target Group".
[6] The Target Group is active in the South African citrus cultivation and export market as grower-exporter. The Target Group owns and manages farms in the Limpopo province, all of which are citrus farms save for one farm which grows macadamias and avocados. The majority of the Target Group's product is exported, while some citrus is sold on the local retail market. Industrial quality fruit is also distributed locally for juicing purposes.
Competition assessment
[7] The Competition Commission (“Commission”) considered the activities of the merging parties and found horizontal overlaps in the upstream market for the cultivation of citrus fruits and the downstream market for sale of citrus fruits.
[8] In the upstream market for the cultivation of citrus fruits, the Commission found that the merging parties’ combined market shares are low – below 5% – in the broad national market as well as in the narrower, regional Limpopo market.
[9] With respect to the downstream market for the sale of citrus fruits, the Commission assessed the local South African citrus market and the citrus export market. In the former, the merged entity will have a market share of less than 10%; while in the latter, market shares remain very low, with the merging parties accounting for less than 2%
of the total citrus exported from South Africa.
[10] No vertical overlap was found between the activities of the merging parties.
[11] Accordingly the transaction does not give rise to any competition concerns.
Public interest
Employment
[12] The merging parties submitted that the proposed transaction will not result in any merger specific retrenchments or job losses.
[13] The employees of Futuregrowth are represented by an employee representative while OMLACSA's employees are represented by SASBO and The Insurance and Banking Staff Association (“IBSA”). IBSA and Futuregrowth’s employee representative confirmed that employees were made aware of the proposed transaction and no concerns were raised. The Commission did not receive any concerns from SASBO.
[14] Fruitone’s employees are represented either by the National Union of Food, Beverage, Wine, Spirit and Allied Workers ("NUFBSAW") or the Food and Allied Workers Union ("FAWU"), or an employee representative. The Commission contacted the relevant trade unions and employee representatives on several occasions and, according to its report, has not received any concerns from them.
Spread of ownership
[15] OM is a Level One Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment (“B-BBEE”) Contributor with approximately 39.47% of black-owned voting rights as well as holding approximately 28.79% black economic interest rights.[4] In addition, Futuregrowth is owned as to 5.9% by a black management trust and 5.3% by a black educational trust.
[16] The Target Group does not have any historically disadvantaged person shareholders.
[17] In light of the above the proposed transaction is unlikely to raise employment concerns or have any impact on the promotion of the greater spread of ownership.
Conclusion
[18] We conclude that the proposed transaction is unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market, or to have a negative impact on public interest.
Date: 3 August 2022
Ms Yasmin Carrim
Dr Thando Vilakazi and Prof Liberty Mncube concurring
Tribunal Case Manager: Leila Raffee
For the Merging Parties: Susan Meyer and Preanka Gounden of Cliffe Dekker
Hofmeyr Inc
For the Commission: Nomthandazo
Mndaweni and Ratshidaho
Maphwanya
[1] OMLACSA has an option to purchase additional shares in Futuregrowth. Inclusive of this transaction, the potential additional shares will not in aggregate exceed 30% of the ordinary shares of Fruitone. See the Competition Commission’s Large Merger Report 2022MAY0037 p9-10.
[2] OM has a primary listing on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange Ltd and is not controlled by any firm
[3] Provinces include Limpopo, Western Cape, Kwa-Zulu Natal, and Mpumalanga.
[4] On a flow-through basis, from OM’s B-BBEE certificate issued 28 March 2022 (Merger Record p911- 912)
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.