FW Ortmann Trust and Another v Gumede and Others (LCC58/2017D) [2019] ZALCC 22 (9 September 2019)
The court found that the respondents' conduct, including threats, violence, arson, and obstruction of court orders, created a real and imminent danger to persons and property on the farm. The applicants had no other effective remedy, and the hardship to them outweighed any hardship to the respondents, who had alternative accommodation available. The requirements of section 15 of ESTA for urgent interim removal were satisfied. The respondents' conduct justified costs on an attorney and client scale, but not for two counsel. The application was for interim removal pending final eviction proceedings, not a final eviction order. The relief sought was granted, with appropriate orders for...
- Citation
- [2019] ZALCC 22
- Parties
- Applicant: FW Ortmann Trust; Applicant: Ortmann Brothers; Respondent: Lucy Gumede; Respondent: Bongiwe Gumede; Respondent: Bonginkosi Gumede; Respondent: Thulani Gumede; Respondent: Thandiwe Gumede; Respondent: Jabulisile Gumede; Respondent: Sifiso Gumede; Respondent: Sanelisiwe Gumede; Respondent: Xolani Gumede
- Court
- Land Claims Court
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 9 September 2019
- Case Number
- LCC58/2017D
- Procedural Posture
- Urgent Application / Interim Removal Pending Final Eviction Proceedings
- Outcome
- Urgent interim removal of the First to Ninth Respondents from house number 12 on the farm granted; costs awarded on attorney and client scale; other eviction relief adjourned sine die.
- Judges
- T M Ncube
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Security of Tenure Act, Urgent Eviction, Interim Relief, Municipal Housing Obligations
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
FW Ortmann Trust
Applicant
Ortmann Brothers
Applicant
Lucy Gumede
Respondent
Bongiwe Gumede
Respondent
Bonginkosi Gumede
Respondent
Thulani Gumede
Respondent
Thandiwe Gumede
Respondent
Jabulisile Gumede
Respondent
Sifiso Gumede
Respondent
Sanelisiwe Gumede
Respondent
Xolani Gumede
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Interim Removal Pending Final Eviction Proceedings
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the requirements for urgent interim removal under section 15 of ESTA and/or the LTA are satisfied.
- 2 Whether the respondents pose a real and imminent danger to persons or property on the farm.
- 3 Whether adequate arrangements exist for reinstatement if final eviction is not granted.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the respondents' conduct, including threats, violence, arson, and obstruction of court orders, created a real and imminent danger to persons and property on the farm. The applicants had no other effective remedy, and the hardship to them outweighed any hardship to the respondents, who had alternative accommodation available. The requirements of section 15 of ESTA for urgent interim removal were satisfied. The respondents' conduct justified costs on an attorney and client scale, but not for two counsel. The application was for interim removal pending final eviction proceedings, not a final eviction order. The relief sought was granted, with appropriate orders for...
Court Disposition
Urgent interim removal of the First to Ninth Respondents from house number 12 on the farm granted; costs awarded on attorney and client scale; other eviction relief adjourned sine die.
Orders
- The Sheriff or his Deputy, assisted by SAPS and/or private security, is ordered to forthwith remove the First to Ninth Respondents from house number 12 on the farm pending final eviction proceedings.
- Relief pertaining to eviction of the First to Ninth Respondents is adjourned sine die.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment