G4S Secure Solutions (SA) (Pty) Ltd v Commissioner Ruggiero NO and Others (C389/2011) [2014] ZALCCT 35 (10 July 2014)
The court found that the arbitrator's conclusion that Ntloko was unaware of his criminal convictions and thus did not misrepresent his criminal record was not reasonably justified on the evidence. Ntloko admitted in a disciplinary statement that he had appeared in court and had a fine imposed, contradicting his arbitration testimony. The arbitrator's finding was set aside and substituted with a finding of guilt for failing to disclose his criminal convictions. However, the evidence showed that the employer's principal concern was compliance with the Private Security Industry Regulation Act, not trust issues arising from dishonesty. Since Ntloko's last conviction predated the relevant...
- Citation
- [2014] ZALCCT 35
- Parties
- Applicant: G4S Secure Solutions (SA) (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Commissioner Anthony Ruggiero (N.O.); Respondent: Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration; Respondent: Thandabantu Ntloko
- Court
- Labour Court Cape Town
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 10 July 2014
- Case Number
- C389/2011
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Judgment After Review of Arbitration Award
- Outcome
- The review application succeeded in part; the arbitrator's finding was set aside and substituted with a finding of guilt for misrepresentation. Relief was substituted with reinstatement and payment of arrear remuneration.
- Judges
- R Lagrange
- Legal Topics
- Condonation of Late Filing, Misrepresentation, Dishonesty in Employment, Private Security Industry Regulation Act, Unfair Dismissal
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
G4S Secure Solutions (SA) (Pty) Ltd
Applicant
Commissioner Anthony Ruggiero (N.O.)
Respondent
Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration
Respondent
Thandabantu Ntloko
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Judgment After Review of Arbitration Award
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the arbitrator reasonably concluded that the employee was unaware of his criminal convictions and thus did not misrepresent his criminal record.
- 2 Whether the arbitrator acted ultra vires in ordering reinstatement when compensation was sought.
- 3 Whether the arbitrator misconstrued the nature of the enquiry regarding disclosure of criminal convictions by employees.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the arbitrator's conclusion that Ntloko was unaware of his criminal convictions and thus did not misrepresent his criminal record was not reasonably justified on the evidence. Ntloko admitted in a disciplinary statement that he had appeared in court and had a fine imposed, contradicting his arbitration testimony. The arbitrator's finding was set aside and substituted with a finding of guilt for failing to disclose his criminal convictions. However, the evidence showed that the employer's principal concern was compliance with the Private Security Industry Regulation Act, not trust issues arising from dishonesty. Since Ntloko's last conviction predated the relevant...
Court Disposition
The review application succeeded in part; the arbitrator's finding was set aside and substituted with a finding of guilt for misrepresentation. Relief was substituted with reinstatement and payment of arrear remuneration.
Orders
- The applicant's late filing of the review application and the third respondent's late filing of his answering affidavit are condoned.
- The arbitrator's finding that the third respondent was not guilty of misrepresenting his criminal record is reviewed and set aside and substituted with a finding of guilt.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment