Galaxy Bingo Pavilion (Pty) Ltd and Others v Peermont Global KZN (Pty) Ltd and Others (14006/16P) [2018] ZAKZPHC 11 (17 April 2018)

Galaxy Bingo Pavilion (Pty) Ltd and Others v Peermont Global KZN (Pty) Ltd and Others (14006/16P) [2018] ZAKZPHC 11 (17 April 2018)

The application for a stay of the Peermont review is dismissed. The court finds that Peermont is not a party to the MEC's review, as it has not been granted leave to intervene, and therefore the requirement of pending litigation between the same parties for lis alibi pendens is not satisfied. The mere existence of an application to intervene does not make Peermont a party to the suit. Furthermore, the withdrawal of the MEC's review by the Premier and MEC means there is no pending litigation at their instance. Even if the Afrisun review is considered, Peermont is not yet a party to those proceedings. The court also exercises its discretion against granting a stay, noting that the Peermont...

Citation
[2018] ZAKZPHC 11
Parties
Applicant: Galaxy Bingo Pavilion (Pty) Ltd; Applicant: Galaxy Bingo Midlands (Pty) Ltd; Applicant: Galaxy Bingo Gateway (Pty) Ltd; Applicant: Galaxy Bingo Kwazulu-Natal (Pty) Ltd; Applicant: Galaxy Bingo Amanzimtoti (Pty) Ltd; Applicant: Galaxy Bingo South Coast (Pty) Ltd; Applicant: Galaxy Bingo Empangeni (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Peermont Global KZN (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Fourteen Others
Court
Kwazulu-Natal High Court, Pietermaritzburg
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
17 April 2018
Case Number
14006/16P
Procedural Posture
Stay Application / Application for Stay of Proceedings Pending Outcome of Related Litigation
Outcome
Application dismissed with costs, including costs of two counsel where so employed.
Judges
Koen
Legal Topics
Lis Alibi Pendens, Stay of Proceedings, Joinder and Intervention, Administrative Review

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 24 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Galaxy Bingo Pavilion (Pty) Ltd

Applicant

Galaxy Bingo Midlands (Pty) Ltd

Applicant

Galaxy Bingo Gateway (Pty) Ltd

Applicant

Galaxy Bingo Kwazulu-Natal (Pty) Ltd

Applicant

Galaxy Bingo Amanzimtoti (Pty) Ltd

Applicant

Galaxy Bingo South Coast (Pty) Ltd

Applicant

Galaxy Bingo Empangeni (Pty) Ltd

Applicant

Peermont Global KZN (Pty) Ltd

Respondent

Fourteen Others

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Stay Application / Application for Stay of Proceedings Pending Outcome of Related Litigation

  1. 1 Whether the Peermont review application should be stayed on the basis of lis alibi pendens pending the outcome of related proceedings.
  2. 2 Whether Peermont is a party to the pending litigation under case number 1366/15 for the purposes of lis alibi pendens.
  3. 3 Whether the withdrawal of the MEC's review application affects the existence of pending litigation relevant to the stay application.

Ratio Decidendi

The application for a stay of the Peermont review is dismissed. The court finds that Peermont is not a party to the MEC's review, as it has not been granted leave to intervene, and therefore the requirement of pending litigation between the same parties for lis alibi pendens is not satisfied. The mere existence of an application to intervene does not make Peermont a party to the suit. Furthermore, the withdrawal of the MEC's review by the Premier and MEC means there is no pending litigation at their instance. Even if the Afrisun review is considered, Peermont is not yet a party to those proceedings. The court also exercises its discretion against granting a stay, noting that the Peermont...

Court Disposition

Application dismissed with costs, including costs of two counsel where so employed.

Orders

  • The application is dismissed with costs, to include the costs of two counsel where so employed.