Gama v Mchunu and Others (10/37362) [2015] ZAGPJHC 273 (22 November 2015)
The court found that the applicant and the deceased entered into a valid customary marriage on 8 June 2000, satisfying all requirements under section 3(1) of the Recognition of Customary Marriages Act. The evidence, including affidavits and documentary proof, established that both families participated in lobolo...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2015] ZAGPJHC 273
- Parties
- Applicant: Makhosazane Zerish Gama; Respondent: Bonisile Mchunu; Respondent: Department of Home Affairs; Respondent: The Master of the South Gauteng High Court
- Court
- South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 22 November 2015
- Case Number
- 10/37362
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Application / First Instance Judgment
- Outcome
- Application granted in favour of the applicant.
- Judges
- Moshidi
- Legal Topics
- Recognition of Customary Marriages Act, Registration of Customary Marriage, Condonation of Late Registration, Matrimonial Property Regime, Lobolo Negotiations
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Makhosazane Zerish Gama
Applicant
Bonisile Mchunu
Respondent
Department of Home Affairs
Respondent
The Master of the South Gauteng High Court
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / First Instance Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a valid customary marriage existed between the applicant and the deceased.
- 2 Whether the late registration of the customary marriage should be condoned.
- 3 Whether the Department of Home Affairs should be compelled to register the marriage and issue a certificate.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant and the deceased entered into a valid customary marriage on 8 June 2000, satisfying all requirements under section 3(1) of the Recognition of Customary Marriages Act. The evidence, including affidavits and documentary proof, established that both families participated in lobolo negotiations and that the first respondent consented to the marriage. The failure to register the marriage timeously was not fatal, as section 4(9) of the Act provides that non-registration does not affect validity. The court distinguished the present facts from M M v M N, noting that the marriage occurred before the Act commenced and that the parties attempted to comply with...
Court Disposition
Application granted in favour of the applicant.
Orders
- The late registration of the customary marriage entered into by the applicant and the deceased on 8 June 2000 is condoned.
- The Department of Home Affairs is ordered to register the customary marriage between the applicant and the deceased.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment