Gate Development (Pty) Ltd and Another v Mahlangu and Others (LCC103/08) [2009] ZALCC 2 (4 March 2009)
The court found that the respondents' legal representative was unable to consult with witnesses due to circumstances beyond his control, specifically being denied access to the farm. However, the prior lack of preparation by the respondents' attorneys was not relevant to the present application for postponement. On the substantive issue, the court held that an established practice of burial existed on the farm, as evidenced by burials since 1971, including recent burials, and that irregularity or inconsistency does not negate the obligation to permit burials under section 6(2)(dA) of the Land Reform (Labour Tenants) Act. The purported waiver signed by the deceased was not valid, as...
- Citation
- [2009] ZALCC 2
- Parties
- Applicant: Gate Development (Pty) Ltd; Applicant: Van Breda, Willem Wehlburg N.O. (Executor in the estate of late Ander Steinbel); Respondent: Mahlangu, Mrensnselula; Respondent: Mthombeni, Malalelo Martha; Respondent: Mahlangu, Zoel; Respondent: Mthomeni, Willem; Respondent: Mthombeni, Thomas
- Court
- Land Claims Court
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 4 March 2009
- Case Number
- LCC103/08
- Procedural Posture
- Urgent Application / Application for Further Postponement and Substantive Determination of Burial Rights
- Outcome
- Application granted; the applicant is entitled to bury her husband on Rocky Ridge farm. No order as to costs.
- Judges
- Bam JP
- Legal Topics
- Land Reform Labour Tenants Act, Burial Rights on Farm, Waiver of Rights, Established Practice, Judicial Discretion Postponement
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Gate Development (Pty) Ltd
Applicant
Van Breda, Willem Wehlburg N.O. (Executor in the estate of late Ander Steinbel)
Applicant
Mahlangu, Mrensnselula
Respondent
Mthombeni, Malalelo Martha
Respondent
Mahlangu, Zoel
Respondent
Mthomeni, Willem
Respondent
Mthombeni, Thomas
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Application for Further Postponement and Substantive Determination of Burial Rights
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondents' application for a further postponement should be granted.
- 2 Whether the applicant, as an occupier, has a right to bury her husband on Rocky Ridge farm under section 6(2)(dA) of the Land Reform (Labour Tenants) Act.
- 3 Whether an alleged waiver of burial rights by the deceased is valid under section 25 of the Act.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the respondents' legal representative was unable to consult with witnesses due to circumstances beyond his control, specifically being denied access to the farm. However, the prior lack of preparation by the respondents' attorneys was not relevant to the present application for postponement. On the substantive issue, the court held that an established practice of burial existed on the farm, as evidenced by burials since 1971, including recent burials, and that irregularity or inconsistency does not negate the obligation to permit burials under section 6(2)(dA) of the Land Reform (Labour Tenants) Act. The purported waiver signed by the deceased was not valid, as...
Court Disposition
Application granted; the applicant is entitled to bury her husband on Rocky Ridge farm. No order as to costs.
Orders
- The application for burial on Rocky Ridge farm is granted.
- No order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment