Gaylard v Telkom South Africa Ltd (C153/97) [1998] ZALC 13 (15 May 1998)

Gaylard v Telkom South Africa Ltd (C153/97) [1998] ZALC 13 (15 May 1998)

The court held that the applicant's claim for accumulated leave pay was based on the employment contract and constituted a claim for remuneration. The Labour Court, under the Labour Relations Act in force at the time, did not have jurisdiction to adjudicate disputes concerning the interpretation or application of individual employment contracts or claims for remuneration. Accumulated leave pay does not fall within the definition of 'benefit' under item 2(1)(b) of Schedule 7 to the Act, as it is simply remuneration owed under contract. The pending amendment to the Basic Conditions of Employment Act would confer such jurisdiction, but was not yet in force. Accordingly, the court dismissed...

Citation
[1998] ZALC 13
Parties
Applicant: R R Gaylard; Respondent: Telkom South Africa Ltd
Court
Labour Court
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
15 May 1998
Case Number
C153/97
Procedural Posture
Civil Jurisdictional Challenge / Point in Limine on Jurisdiction
Outcome
Applicant's claim dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
Judges
E Revelas
Legal Topics
Jurisdiction of Labour Court, Accumulated Leave Pay, Residual Unfair Labour Practice, Remuneration Claim, Interpretation of Employment Contract
Labour Law Jurisdiction of Labour Court Accumulated Leave Pay Residual Unfair Labour Practice Remuneration Claim Interpretation of Employment Contract

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

R R Gaylard

Applicant

Telkom South Africa Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Jurisdictional Challenge / Point in Limine on Jurisdiction

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Does the Labour Court have jurisdiction to adjudicate a claim for accumulated leave pay based on an individual employment contract?
  2. 2 Is accumulated leave pay a 'benefit' within the meaning of item 2(1)(b) of Schedule 7 to the Labour Relations Act?
  3. 3 Can the applicant's claim be characterized as a residual unfair labour practice?

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the applicant's claim for accumulated leave pay was based on the employment contract and constituted a claim for remuneration. The Labour Court, under the Labour Relations Act in force at the time, did not have jurisdiction to adjudicate disputes concerning the interpretation or application of individual employment contracts or claims for remuneration. Accumulated leave pay does not fall within the definition of 'benefit' under item 2(1)(b) of Schedule 7 to the Act, as it is simply remuneration owed under contract. The pending amendment to the Basic Conditions of Employment Act would confer such jurisdiction, but was not yet in force. Accordingly, the court dismissed...

Court Disposition

Applicant's claim dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

Orders

  • The applicant’s claim is dismissed.
  • No order as to costs.