Gecelter NO v Nare and Others (14722/03) [2004] ZAGPHC 32 (6 October 2004)
The applicant, as executrix of the estate of the late Morris Wynne, is the only person with locus standi to bring the eviction application, as the property remains registered in the deceased's name. The cancellation notices, though issued by Double-Quick Properties 72 CC as agent, were valid, and the respondents conceded the agency relationship. The respondents have not paid rent and are in breach of their lease agreements, and their contracts have validly come to an end. However, given the respondents' financial circumstances and lengthy occupation, immediate eviction would be unfair. The court therefore orders eviction to take effect from 15 November 2004, allowing respondents...
- Citation
- [2004] ZAGPHC 32
- Parties
- Applicant: Sybel Gecelter N.O.; Respondent: Cainot Thabang Nare & 17 Others
- Court
- High Courts - Gauteng
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 6 October 2004
- Case Number
- 14722/03
- Procedural Posture
- Eviction Application / First Instance
- Outcome
- Eviction granted with delayed effect; no costs order made.
- Judges
- Willis
- Legal Topics
- Eviction, Locus Standi, Breach of Lease, Notice of Cancellation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sybel Gecelter N.O.
Applicant
Cainot Thabang Nare & 17 Others
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Eviction Application / First Instance
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant has locus standi to bring the eviction application.
- 2 Whether the cancellation notices served on the respondents were valid.
- 3 Whether the respondents are entitled to remain in occupation despite non-payment of rent.
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant, as executrix of the estate of the late Morris Wynne, is the only person with locus standi to bring the eviction application, as the property remains registered in the deceased's name. The cancellation notices, though issued by Double-Quick Properties 72 CC as agent, were valid, and the respondents conceded the agency relationship. The respondents have not paid rent and are in breach of their lease agreements, and their contracts have validly come to an end. However, given the respondents' financial circumstances and lengthy occupation, immediate eviction would be unfair. The court therefore orders eviction to take effect from 15 November 2004, allowing respondents...
Court Disposition
Eviction granted with delayed effect; no costs order made.
Orders
- Eviction of the respondents and all occupants of Winray Court, Erf 3520, 96 Twist Street, Hillbrow, to take effect on 15 November 2004.
- Relief in prayer 2 of the claim is granted, with the relevant date set as 15 November 2004.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment