Gedu Nee Raboko v Road Accident Fund (2587/2021) [2025] ZAFSHC 67 (21 February 2025)

Gedu Nee Raboko v Road Accident Fund (2587/2021) [2025] ZAFSHC 67 (21 February 2025)

The court found that the plaintiff had proven her entitlement to compensation for past and future loss of earnings based on uncontested expert and actuarial evidence. The injuries sustained in the motor vehicle collision resulted in permanent physical and psychological impairment, significantly reducing her earning capacity and limiting her ability to compete in the open labour market. The court accepted the proposed contingency deductions as reasonable, given the plaintiff's limited work history and lack of documentary proof of earnings. The defendant's admissions at the pre-trial conference established the plaintiff's entitlement to general damages. The court determined that an award of...

Citation
[2025] ZAFSHC 67
Parties
Plaintiff: Nkholiseng Reginah Gedu [Neé Raboko]; Defendant: Road Accident Fund
Court
Free State High Court, Bloemfontein
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
21 February 2025
Case Number
2587/2021
Procedural Posture
Civil Trial / Final Judgment
Outcome
Plaintiff's claim for loss of earnings and general damages is granted. Defendant is ordered to pay the plaintiff R2 400 000.00 within 180 days, plus interest and costs.
Judges
De Kock, AJ
Legal Topics
Road Accident Fund Act, Loss of Earnings, General Damages, Contingency Deductions, Expert Evidence

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 14 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Nkholiseng Reginah Gedu [Neé Raboko]

Plaintiff

Road Accident Fund

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Trial / Final Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to compensation for past and future loss of earnings resulting from injuries sustained in a motor vehicle collision.
  2. 2 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to general damages for pain, suffering, and loss of amenities of life.
  3. 3 What contingency deductions are appropriate in calculating the plaintiff's loss of earnings.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the plaintiff had proven her entitlement to compensation for past and future loss of earnings based on uncontested expert and actuarial evidence. The injuries sustained in the motor vehicle collision resulted in permanent physical and psychological impairment, significantly reducing her earning capacity and limiting her ability to compete in the open labour market. The court accepted the proposed contingency deductions as reasonable, given the plaintiff's limited work history and lack of documentary proof of earnings. The defendant's admissions at the pre-trial conference established the plaintiff's entitlement to general damages. The court determined that an award of...

Court Disposition

Plaintiff's claim for loss of earnings and general damages is granted. Defendant is ordered to pay the plaintiff R2 400 000.00 within 180 days, plus interest and costs.

Orders

  • The defendant shall pay the plaintiff the sum of R2 400 000.00 (two million four hundred thousand rand) in terms of quantum, comprising R1 600 000.00 for loss of earnings and R800 000.00 for general damages.
  • The defendant shall pay the amount of R2 400 000.00 within 180 days of the date hereof into the plaintiff’s attorneys' trust account.