Genaral Industries Workers Union (GIWUSA) and Another v Moulding Profiles (Pty) Ltd (JR 2482/07) [2010] ZALC 128 (20 August 2010)
The court found that the respondent failed to take any meaningful steps to prosecute its review application for over three years, did not file the required arbitration record, and ignored correspondence from the applicants. The respondent's denial of receipt of notices and correspondence was unsupported by any explanation or evidence. The court concluded that the respondent's conduct was dilatory and amounted to an abuse of the review mechanism. The respondent's absence at the hearing further demonstrated its lack of intention to pursue the matter. Accordingly, the review application was dismissed, the arbitration award was made an order of court, and costs were awarded against the...
- Citation
- [2010] ZALC 128
- Parties
- Applicant: General Industries Workers Union (GIWUSA); Applicant: Bulelani Masangwuana; Respondent: Moulding Profiles (Pty) Ltd
- Court
- Labour Court
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 20 August 2010
- Case Number
- JR 2482/07
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Application to Dismiss Review and Make Arbitration Award an Order of Court
- Outcome
- The respondent's review application is dismissed. The arbitration award is made an order of court. Costs are awarded against the respondent on an attorney and own client scale.
- Judges
- Lagrange
- Legal Topics
- Review of Arbitration Award, Condonation, Abuse of Process, Dismissal of Review Application
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
General Industries Workers Union (GIWUSA)
Applicant
Bulelani Masangwuana
Applicant
Moulding Profiles (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Application to Dismiss Review and Make Arbitration Award an Order of Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent's review application should be dismissed due to inordinate delay and lack of prosecution.
- 2 Whether the arbitration award should be made an order of court.
- 3 Whether the respondent's conduct amounts to an abuse of the review process.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the respondent failed to take any meaningful steps to prosecute its review application for over three years, did not file the required arbitration record, and ignored correspondence from the applicants. The respondent's denial of receipt of notices and correspondence was unsupported by any explanation or evidence. The court concluded that the respondent's conduct was dilatory and amounted to an abuse of the review mechanism. The respondent's absence at the hearing further demonstrated its lack of intention to pursue the matter. Accordingly, the review application was dismissed, the arbitration award was made an order of court, and costs were awarded against the...
Court Disposition
The respondent's review application is dismissed. The arbitration award is made an order of court. Costs are awarded against the respondent on an attorney and own client scale.
Orders
- The respondent’s application to review and set aside the second respondent’s review award dated 3 August 2007 issued under CCMA case number GAJB 9714-07 is dismissed.
- The said award is made an order of court.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment