Gencode Software Consulting CC v PB Mthembi Medical Laboratory (Pty) Ltd and Another (2023/056319) [2025] ZAGPJHC 273 (13 March 2025)
The plaintiff's application for summary judgment is incompetent as it seeks judgment on a cause of action not pleaded or verified, namely the first acknowledgement of debt, while its pleaded case is based on the second acknowledgement of debt. The plaintiff has failed to address the defendants' amended plea, which raises triable issues regarding the validity of the second acknowledgement of debt and the quantum of the indebtedness. The affidavit in support of summary judgment does not comply with rule 32(2)(b), as it does not explain why the defence does not raise any issue for trial. The plaintiff cannot rely on admissions in the plea to obtain partial summary judgment while abandoning...
- Citation
- [2025] ZAGPJHC 273
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Gencode Software Consulting CC; Defendant: PB Mthembi Medical Laboratory (Pty) Ltd; Defendant: Phillip Mthembi
- Court
- South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 13 March 2025
- Case Number
- 2023/056319
- Procedural Posture
- Summary Judgment Application / Application for Summary Judgment Following Amended Plea and Supplementary Affidavit
- Outcome
- Summary judgment application dismissed; defendants granted leave to defend; costs to be costs in the cause.
- Judges
- De Oliveira
- Legal Topics
- Summary Judgment, Acknowledgement of Debt, Suretyship, Non Variation Clause, Quantum of Indebtedness
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Gencode Software Consulting CC
Plaintiff
PB Mthembi Medical Laboratory (Pty) Ltd
Defendant
Phillip Mthembi
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Summary Judgment Application / Application for Summary Judgment Following Amended Plea and Supplementary Affidavit
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on the basis of admitted indebtedness in the defendants' amended plea.
- 2 Whether the defendants' amended plea raises triable issues precluding summary judgment.
- 3 Whether the second defendant is liable as surety under the second acknowledgement of debt.
Ratio Decidendi
The plaintiff's application for summary judgment is incompetent as it seeks judgment on a cause of action not pleaded or verified, namely the first acknowledgement of debt, while its pleaded case is based on the second acknowledgement of debt. The plaintiff has failed to address the defendants' amended plea, which raises triable issues regarding the validity of the second acknowledgement of debt and the quantum of the indebtedness. The affidavit in support of summary judgment does not comply with rule 32(2)(b), as it does not explain why the defence does not raise any issue for trial. The plaintiff cannot rely on admissions in the plea to obtain partial summary judgment while abandoning...
Court Disposition
Summary judgment application dismissed; defendants granted leave to defend; costs to be costs in the cause.
Orders
- The summary judgment application is dismissed.
- The defendants are granted leave to defend the plaintiff's action.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment