General Industries Workers Union (GIWUSA) and Others Moulding Profiles (Pty) Ltd (JR2482/07) [2010] ZALCJHB 62 (20 August 2010)
The court found that the respondent failed to take any meaningful steps to prosecute its review application for over three years, did not file the required arbitration record, and ignored correspondence from the applicants. The respondent provided no explanation for its inactivity and did not attend the hearing. The court concluded that the respondent's conduct amounted to an abuse of the review process and that the application was filed as a dilatory tactic without genuine intent to pursue the matter. Consequently, the review application was dismissed, and the arbitration award was made an order of court. Costs were awarded against the respondent on an attorney and own client scale.
- Citation
- [2010] ZALCJHB 62
- Parties
- Applicant: General Industries Workers Union (GIWUSA); Applicant: Bulelani Masangwuana; Respondent: Moulding Profiles (Pty) Ltd
- Court
- Labour Court Johannesburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 20 August 2010
- Case Number
- JR 2482/07
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Application to Dismiss Review and Make Arbitration Award an Order of Court
- Outcome
- Review application dismissed; arbitration award made an order of court; costs awarded against respondent.
- Judges
- Lagrange
- Legal Topics
- Condonation for Late Filing, Abuse of Process, Review of Arbitration Award, Rule 7a Non Compliance
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
General Industries Workers Union (GIWUSA)
Applicant
Bulelani Masangwuana
Applicant
Moulding Profiles (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Application to Dismiss Review and Make Arbitration Award an Order of Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent's delay in prosecuting the review application warrants dismissal of the review.
- 2 Whether the arbitration award should be made an order of court.
- 3 Whether the respondent abused the review process.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the respondent failed to take any meaningful steps to prosecute its review application for over three years, did not file the required arbitration record, and ignored correspondence from the applicants. The respondent provided no explanation for its inactivity and did not attend the hearing. The court concluded that the respondent's conduct amounted to an abuse of the review process and that the application was filed as a dilatory tactic without genuine intent to pursue the matter. Consequently, the review application was dismissed, and the arbitration award was made an order of court. Costs were awarded against the respondent on an attorney and own client scale.
Court Disposition
Review application dismissed; arbitration award made an order of court; costs awarded against respondent.
Orders
- The respondent’s application to review and set aside the second respondent’s review award dated 3 August 2007 issued under CCMA case number GAJB 9714-07 is dismissed.
- The said award is made an order of court.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment